Sverige FYI› Rankings› Residents' view› Safety
Municipalities where most residents report burglary and theft problems
Statistics Sweden asks residents how much of a problem burglary and theft are in the neighborhood where they live — participation in the question varies between municipalities and years, as elsewhere in the survey. This list ranks municipalities by the share who see a problem, worst first — residents' experience, not reported crime. The national average across the 159 municipalities answering in 2025 is 39%.
Source: Statistics Sweden, ME0003 Last updated: 2025
39%
national average 2025
159 / 290
municipalities took part
63.3%
largest problem · Eskilstuna
Place 1 is the municipality with the largest problem. The figure beneath it is the national rank, where #1 is always the best result — the same figure shown on the map.
Differences are shown in percentage points (pp).
Filters the list by municipality name.
290 municipalities
| Place | Municipality | Share seeing a problem | vs national average | Trend | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 place 1 on this list national rank 159 of 159 | Eskilstuna Södermanlands län | 63.3% | worse than the national average +24 | −5.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
2 place 2 on this list national rank 158 of 159 | Söderhamn Gävleborgs län | 62.9% | worse than the national average +24 | −0.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
3 place 3 on this list national rank 157 of 159 | Köping Västmanlands län | 62.1% | worse than the national average +23 | −7.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
4 place 4 on this list national rank 156 of 159 | Ronneby Blekinge län | 62.0% | worse than the national average +23 | −0.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
5 place 5 on this list national rank 155 of 159 | Södertälje Stockholms län | 60.7% | worse than the national average +21 | −9.5 (2021→2025) improved | → |
6 place 6 on this list national rank 154 of 159 | Perstorp Skåne län | 60.1% | worse than the national average +21 | −11.5 (2021→2025) improved | → |
7 place 7 on this list national rank 153 of 159 | Nybro Kalmar län | 58.1% | worse than the national average +19 | −0.9 (2021→2025) improved | → |
8 place 8 on this list national rank 152 of 159 | Säffle Värmlands län | 57.7% | worse than the national average +18 | −12.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
9 place 9 on this list national rank 150 of 159 | Hässleholm Skåne län | 57.4% | worse than the national average +18 | −6.7 (2021→2025) improved | → |
9 place 9 on this list national rank 150 of 159 | Örebro Örebro län | 57.4% | worse than the national average +18 | −3.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
11 place 11 on this list national rank 149 of 159 | Helsingborg Skåne län | 54.8% | worse than the national average +15 | −12.6 (2021→2025) improved | → |
12 place 12 on this list national rank 148 of 159 | Gävle Gävleborgs län | 54.7% | worse than the national average +15 | −14.7 (2021→2025) improved | → |
13 place 13 on this list national rank 147 of 159 | Landskrona Skåne län | 52.1% | worse than the national average +13 | −4.9 (2021→2025) improved | → |
14 place 14 on this list national rank 146 of 159 | Malmö Skåne län | 51.9% | worse than the national average +13 | −14.6 (2022→2025) improved | → |
15 place 15 on this list national rank 145 of 159 | Järfälla Stockholms län | 51.5% | worse than the national average +12 | −13.3 (2021→2025) improved | → |
16 place 16 on this list national rank 144 of 159 | Uddevalla Västra Götalands län | 50.8% | worse than the national average +11 | −14.6 (2021→2025) improved | → |
17 place 17 on this list national rank 143 of 159 | Bengtsfors Västra Götalands län | 50.7% | worse than the national average +11 | −18.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
18 place 18 on this list national rank 142 of 159 | Emmaboda Kalmar län | 50.5% | worse than the national average +11 | −9.2 (2022→2025) improved | → |
19 place 19 on this list national rank 141 of 159 | Danderyd Stockholms län | 49.5% | worse than the national average +10 | −20.9 (2021→2025) improved | → |
20 place 20 on this list national rank 140 of 159 | Hallstahammar Västmanlands län | 48.7% | worse than the national average +9 | −2.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
21 place 21 on this list national rank 139 of 159 | Skara Västra Götalands län | 48.4% | worse than the national average +9 | −6.6 (2021→2025) improved | → |
22 place 22 on this list national rank 138 of 159 | Göteborg Västra Götalands län | 48.2% | worse than the national average +9 | −10.9 (2021→2025) improved | → |
23 place 23 on this list national rank 137 of 159 | Avesta Dalarnas län | 47.5% | worse than the national average +8 | −2.5 (2021→2025) improved | → |
24 place 24 on this list national rank 136 of 159 | Uppsala Uppsala län | 46.9% | worse than the national average +8 | −7.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
25 place 25 on this list national rank 135 of 159 | Gislaved Jönköpings län | 46.6% | worse than the national average +7 | −10.5 (2021→2025) improved | → |
26 place 26 on this list national rank 134 of 159 | Bromölla Skåne län | 46.4% | worse than the national average +7 | −9.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
27 place 27 on this list national rank 133 of 159 | Nyköping Södermanlands län | 45.9% | worse than the national average +7 | −5.0 (2021→2025) improved | → |
28 place 28 on this list national rank 132 of 159 | Åstorp Skåne län | 45.7% | worse than the national average +6 | −13.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
29 place 29 on this list national rank 131 of 159 | Växjö Kronobergs län | 45.1% | worse than the national average +6 | −10.2 (2021→2025) improved | → |
30 place 30 on this list national rank 129 of 159 | Falköping Västra Götalands län | 44.0% | worse than the national average +5 | −3.3 (2022→2025) improved | → |
30 place 30 on this list national rank 129 of 159 | Markaryd Kronobergs län | 44.0% | worse than the national average +5 | −18.3 (2021→2025) improved | → |
32 place 32 on this list national rank 128 of 159 | Botkyrka Stockholms län | 43.8% | worse than the national average +4 | −11.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
33 place 33 on this list national rank 126 of 159 | Huddinge Stockholms län | 43.0% | worse than the national average +4 | −15.0 (2021→2025) improved | → |
33 place 33 on this list national rank 126 of 159 | Motala Östergötlands län | 43.0% | worse than the national average +4 | −5.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
35 place 35 on this list national rank 125 of 159 | Kristinehamn Värmlands län | 42.8% | worse than the national average +3 | −7.9 (2021→2025) improved | → |
36 place 36 on this list national rank 124 of 159 | Katrineholm Södermanlands län | 42.7% | worse than the national average +3 | −10.2 (2021→2025) improved | → |
37 place 37 on this list national rank 123 of 159 | Värnamo Jönköpings län | 42.2% | worse than the national average +3 | −18.5 (2021→2025) improved | → |
38 place 38 on this list national rank 122 of 159 | Kalmar Kalmar län | 42.0% | worse than the national average +3 | −4.6 (2021→2025) improved | → |
39 place 39 on this list national rank 121 of 159 | Hudiksvall Gävleborgs län | 41.9% | worse than the national average +3 | −4.9 (2022→2025) improved | → |
40 place 40 on this list national rank 120 of 159 | Svenljunga Västra Götalands län | 41.6% | worse than the national average +2 | +7.1 (2023→2025) worsened | → |
41 place 41 on this list national rank 119 of 159 | Ljungby Kronobergs län | 41.4% | worse than the national average +2 | −7.3 (2023→2025) improved | → |
42 place 42 on this list national rank 118 of 159 | Borås Västra Götalands län | 41.3% | worse than the national average +2 | −14.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
43 place 43 on this list national rank 117 of 159 | Haparanda Norrbottens län | 40.9% | worse than the national average +2 | −10.9 (2021→2025) improved | → |
44 place 44 on this list national rank 116 of 159 | Örkelljunga Skåne län | 40.2% | worse than the national average +1 | −20.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
45 place 45 on this list national rank 115 of 159 | Klippan Skåne län | 39.7% | at national average | −16.0 (2021→2025) improved | → |
46 place 46 on this list national rank 114 of 159 | Trelleborg Skåne län | 39.6% | at national average | −12.7 (2021→2025) improved | → |
47 place 47 on this list national rank 113 of 159 | Lilla Edet Västra Götalands län | 39.5% | at national average | −16.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
48 place 48 on this list national rank 112 of 159 | Sölvesborg Blekinge län | 38.7% | better than the national average −1 | −8.3 (2022→2025) improved | → |
49 place 49 on this list national rank 111 of 159 | Linköping Östergötlands län | 38.2% | better than the national average −1 | −18.3 (2021→2025) improved | → |
50 place 50 on this list national rank 110 of 159 | Tyresö Stockholms län | 38.0% | better than the national average −1 | −14.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
51 place 51 on this list national rank 108 of 159 | Sjöbo Skåne län | 37.9% | better than the national average −1 | −2.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
51 place 51 on this list national rank 108 of 159 | Upplands-Bro Stockholms län | 37.9% | better than the national average −1 | −26.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
53 place 53 on this list national rank 107 of 159 | Skurup Skåne län | 37.7% | better than the national average −2 | −22.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
54 place 54 on this list national rank 106 of 159 | Enköping Uppsala län | 37.6% | better than the national average −2 | −13.0 (2021→2025) improved | → |
55 place 55 on this list national rank 105 of 159 | Svalöv Skåne län | 36.8% | better than the national average −3 | too few years | → |
56 place 56 on this list national rank 104 of 159 | Sala Västmanlands län | 36.7% | better than the national average −3 | −5.7 (2022→2025) improved | → |
57 place 57 on this list national rank 102 of 159 | Oskarshamn Kalmar län | 36.3% | better than the national average −3 | −6.5 (2021→2025) improved | → |
57 place 57 on this list national rank 102 of 159 | Älmhult Kronobergs län | 36.3% | better than the national average −3 | −12.5 (2021→2025) improved | → |
59 place 59 on this list national rank 100 of 159 | Lomma Skåne län | 36.0% | better than the national average −3 | +0.8 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
59 place 59 on this list national rank 100 of 159 | Vetlanda Jönköpings län | 36.0% | better than the national average −3 | −6.3 (2021→2025) improved | → |
61 place 61 on this list national rank 99 of 159 | Orsa Dalarnas län | 35.7% | better than the national average −4 | +8.1 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
62 place 62 on this list national rank 96 of 159 | Lindesberg Örebro län | 35.5% | better than the national average −4 | −14.3 (2023→2025) improved | → |
62 place 62 on this list national rank 96 of 159 | Ludvika Dalarnas län | 35.5% | better than the national average −4 | −16.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
62 place 62 on this list national rank 96 of 159 | Trollhättan Västra Götalands län | 35.5% | better than the national average −4 | −16.0 (2023→2025) improved | → |
65 place 65 on this list national rank 95 of 159 | Karlstad Värmlands län | 35.4% | better than the national average −4 | −4.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
66 place 66 on this list national rank 94 of 159 | Ängelholm Skåne län | 35.2% | better than the national average −4 | −11.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
67 place 67 on this list national rank 92 of 159 | Håbo Uppsala län | 35.1% | better than the national average −4 | −21.9 (2021→2025) improved | → |
67 place 67 on this list national rank 92 of 159 | Ystad Skåne län | 35.1% | better than the national average −4 | −4.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
69 place 69 on this list national rank 91 of 159 | Sundsvall Västernorrlands län | 34.6% | better than the national average −5 | −11.6 (2021→2025) improved | → |
70 place 70 on this list national rank 90 of 159 | Kungsbacka Hallands län | 34.5% | better than the national average −5 | −11.3 (2021→2025) improved | → |
71 place 71 on this list national rank 89 of 159 | Mark Västra Götalands län | 34.4% | better than the national average −5 | too few years | → |
72 place 72 on this list national rank 88 of 159 | Östersund Jämtlands län | 34.0% | better than the national average −5 | −13.7 (2021→2025) improved | → |
73 place 73 on this list national rank 86 of 159 | Lessebo Kronobergs län | 33.6% | better than the national average −6 | −18.0 (2021→2025) improved | → |
73 place 73 on this list national rank 86 of 159 | Mjölby Östergötlands län | 33.6% | better than the national average −6 | −10.0 (2021→2025) improved | → |
75 place 75 on this list national rank 85 of 159 | Hallsberg Örebro län | 33.5% | better than the national average −6 | −7.5 (2021→2025) improved | → |
76 place 76 on this list national rank 83 of 159 | Lidköping Västra Götalands län | 33.4% | better than the national average −6 | −9.9 (2021→2025) improved | → |
76 place 76 on this list national rank 83 of 159 | Mariestad Västra Götalands län | 33.4% | better than the national average −6 | −20.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
78 place 78 on this list national rank 82 of 159 | Karlskrona Blekinge län | 33.2% | better than the national average −6 | −5.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
79 place 79 on this list national rank 81 of 159 | Värmdö Stockholms län | 33.0% | better than the national average −6 | −5.7 (2021→2025) improved | → |
80 place 80 on this list national rank 80 of 159 | Flen Södermanlands län | 32.9% | better than the national average −6 | −10.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
81 place 81 on this list national rank 79 of 159 | Vara Västra Götalands län | 32.7% | better than the national average −7 | −11.5 (2021→2025) improved | → |
82 place 82 on this list national rank 78 of 159 | Gällivare Norrbottens län | 32.6% | better than the national average −7 | −4.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
83 place 83 on this list national rank 77 of 159 | Båstad Skåne län | 32.5% | better than the national average −7 | −20.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
84 place 84 on this list national rank 75 of 159 | Skövde Västra Götalands län | 32.4% | better than the national average −7 | −6.9 (2021→2025) improved | → |
84 place 84 on this list national rank 75 of 159 | Ulricehamn Västra Götalands län | 32.4% | better than the national average −7 | −12.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
86 place 86 on this list national rank 74 of 159 | Boden Norrbottens län | 32.1% | better than the national average −7 | −11.7 (2021→2025) improved | → |
87 place 87 on this list national rank 73 of 159 | Österåker Stockholms län | 32.0% | better than the national average −7 | −18.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
88 place 88 on this list national rank 72 of 159 | Kävlinge Skåne län | 31.9% | better than the national average −7 | −13.6 (2021→2025) improved | → |
89 place 89 on this list national rank 70 of 159 | Salem Stockholms län | 31.5% | better than the national average −8 | −18.9 (2021→2025) improved | → |
89 place 89 on this list national rank 70 of 159 | Strängnäs Södermanlands län | 31.5% | better than the national average −8 | −18.7 (2021→2025) improved | → |
91 place 91 on this list national rank 69 of 159 | Götene Västra Götalands län | 31.3% | better than the national average −8 | −10.3 (2021→2025) improved | → |
92 place 92 on this list national rank 68 of 159 | Jönköping Jönköpings län | 31.2% | better than the national average −8 | −9.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
93 place 93 on this list national rank 66 of 159 | Härnösand Västernorrlands län | 31.0% | better than the national average −8 | −14.7 (2021→2025) improved | → |
93 place 93 on this list national rank 66 of 159 | Nynäshamn Stockholms län | 31.0% | better than the national average −8 | −19.2 (2021→2025) improved | → |
95 place 95 on this list national rank 65 of 159 | Svedala Skåne län | 30.9% | better than the national average −8 | −16.3 (2021→2025) improved | → |
96 place 96 on this list national rank 64 of 159 | Älvkarleby Uppsala län | 30.6% | better than the national average −9 | too few years | → |
97 place 97 on this list national rank 63 of 159 | Täby Stockholms län | 30.5% | better than the national average −9 | −19.2 (2021→2025) improved | → |
98 place 98 on this list national rank 62 of 159 | Ale Västra Götalands län | 30.3% | better than the national average −9 | −5.2 (2023→2025) improved | → |
99 place 99 on this list national rank 61 of 159 | Mölndal Västra Götalands län | 29.6% | better than the national average −10 | −15.2 (2021→2025) improved | → |
100 place 100 on this list national rank 60 of 159 | Västervik Kalmar län | 29.5% | better than the national average −10 | −11.5 (2021→2025) improved | → |
101 place 101 on this list national rank 58 of 159 | Sundbyberg Stockholms län | 29.2% | better than the national average −10 | −13.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
101 place 101 on this list national rank 58 of 159 | Tranås Jönköpings län | 29.2% | better than the national average −10 | −16.5 (2022→2025) improved | → |
103 place 103 on this list national rank 57 of 159 | Lidingö Stockholms län | 29.0% | better than the national average −10 | −20.6 (2021→2025) improved | → |
104 place 104 on this list national rank 56 of 159 | Timrå Västernorrlands län | 28.9% | better than the national average −10 | −8.0 (2021→2025) improved | → |
105 place 105 on this list national rank 54 of 159 | Lund Skåne län | 28.8% | better than the national average −11 | −13.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
105 place 105 on this list national rank 54 of 159 | Lysekil Västra Götalands län | 28.8% | better than the national average −11 | −30.7 (2021→2025) improved | → |
107 place 107 on this list national rank 53 of 159 | Ockelbo Gävleborgs län | 28.7% | better than the national average −11 | −14.0 (2023→2025) improved | → |
108 place 108 on this list national rank 51 of 159 | Luleå Norrbottens län | 28.1% | better than the national average −11 | −13.7 (2021→2025) improved | → |
108 place 108 on this list national rank 51 of 159 | Staffanstorp Skåne län | 28.1% | better than the national average −11 | −11.2 (2021→2025) improved | → |
110 place 110 on this list national rank 50 of 159 | Falun Dalarnas län | 27.5% | better than the national average −12 | −8.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
111 place 111 on this list national rank 48 of 159 | Ekerö Stockholms län | 27.3% | better than the national average −12 | −19.5 (2021→2025) improved | → |
111 place 111 on this list national rank 48 of 159 | Östhammar Uppsala län | 27.3% | better than the national average −12 | −17.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
113 place 113 on this list national rank 47 of 159 | Nykvarn Stockholms län | 27.2% | better than the national average −12 | −20.5 (2021→2025) improved | → |
114 place 114 on this list national rank 46 of 159 | Vellinge Skåne län | 27.1% | better than the national average −12 | −13.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
115 place 115 on this list national rank 43 of 159 | Gnesta Södermanlands län | 26.8% | better than the national average −13 | −17.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
115 place 115 on this list national rank 43 of 159 | Knivsta Uppsala län | 26.8% | better than the national average −13 | −1.0 (2021→2025) improved | → |
115 place 115 on this list national rank 43 of 159 | Piteå Norrbottens län | 26.8% | better than the national average −13 | −7.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
118 place 118 on this list national rank 42 of 159 | Oxelösund Södermanlands län | 26.4% | better than the national average −13 | too few years | → |
119 place 119 on this list national rank 41 of 159 | Herrljunga Västra Götalands län | 25.5% | better than the national average −14 | −17.9 (2021→2025) improved | → |
120 place 120 on this list national rank 40 of 159 | Gnosjö Jönköpings län | 25.4% | better than the national average −14 | −10.0 (2023→2025) improved | → |
121 place 121 on this list national rank 39 of 159 | Gullspång Västra Götalands län | 24.2% | better than the national average −15 | −36.2 (2021→2025) improved | → |
122 place 122 on this list national rank 38 of 159 | Varberg Hallands län | 24.1% | better than the national average −15 | −15.9 (2021→2025) improved | → |
123 place 123 on this list national rank 37 of 159 | Vallentuna Stockholms län | 24.0% | better than the national average −15 | −25.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
124 place 124 on this list national rank 36 of 159 | Trosa Södermanlands län | 22.3% | better than the national average −17 | −9.3 (2021→2025) improved | → |
125 place 125 on this list national rank 35 of 159 | Lekeberg Örebro län | 21.9% | better than the national average −17 | −15.9 (2021→2025) improved | → |
126 place 126 on this list national rank 34 of 159 | Heby Uppsala län | 21.7% | better than the national average −18 | −17.3 (2022→2025) improved | → |
127 place 127 on this list national rank 33 of 159 | Tanum Västra Götalands län | 21.6% | better than the national average −18 | −13.3 (2021→2025) improved | → |
128 place 128 on this list national rank 31 of 159 | Borgholm Kalmar län | 21.5% | better than the national average −18 | +4.3 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
128 place 128 on this list national rank 31 of 159 | Sunne Värmlands län | 21.5% | better than the national average −18 | −12.6 (2022→2025) improved | → |
130 place 130 on this list national rank 30 of 159 | Storfors Värmlands län | 21.4% | better than the national average −18 | too few years | → |
131 place 131 on this list national rank 29 of 159 | Askersund Örebro län | 21.0% | better than the national average −18 | too few years | → |
132 place 132 on this list national rank 27 of 159 | Aneby Jönköpings län | 20.5% | better than the national average −19 | −23.9 (2021→2025) improved | → |
132 place 132 on this list national rank 27 of 159 | Söderköping Östergötlands län | 20.5% | better than the national average −19 | too few years | → |
134 place 134 on this list national rank 26 of 159 | Säter Dalarnas län | 19.5% | better than the national average −20 | −4.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
135 place 135 on this list national rank 24 of 159 | Arvidsjaur Norrbottens län | 19.4% | better than the national average −20 | −26.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
135 place 135 on this list national rank 24 of 159 | Essunga Västra Götalands län | 19.4% | better than the national average −20 | −9.2 (2021→2025) improved | → |
137 place 137 on this list national rank 23 of 159 | Berg Jämtlands län | 19.1% | better than the national average −20 | −3.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
138 place 138 on this list national rank 22 of 159 | Forshaga Värmlands län | 18.6% | better than the national average −21 | −22.2 (2021→2025) improved | → |
139 place 139 on this list national rank 21 of 159 | Mullsjö Jönköpings län | 18.5% | better than the national average −21 | −34.3 (2022→2025) improved | → |
140 place 140 on this list national rank 20 of 159 | Älvdalen Dalarnas län | 18.1% | better than the national average −21 | −12.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
141 place 141 on this list national rank 19 of 159 | Umeå Västerbottens län | 18.0% | better than the national average −21 | −10.5 (2021→2025) improved | → |
142 place 142 on this list national rank 18 of 159 | Åre Jämtlands län | 17.8% | better than the national average −22 | −2.7 (2022→2025) improved | → |
143 place 143 on this list national rank 17 of 159 | Tjörn Västra Götalands län | 17.6% | better than the national average −22 | −10.5 (2021→2025) improved | → |
144 place 144 on this list national rank 16 of 159 | Lycksele Västerbottens län | 15.9% | better than the national average −23 | −12.2 (2021→2025) improved | → |
145 place 145 on this list national rank 15 of 159 | Nordmaling Västerbottens län | 15.0% | better than the national average −24 | −22.3 (2021→2025) improved | → |
146 place 146 on this list national rank 13 of 159 | Kinda Östergötlands län | 14.9% | better than the national average −24 | −26.3 (2021→2025) improved | → |
146 place 146 on this list national rank 13 of 159 | Mörbylånga Kalmar län | 14.9% | better than the national average −24 | −7.9 (2021→2025) improved | → |
148 place 148 on this list national rank 12 of 159 | Vännäs Västerbottens län | 13.3% | better than the national average −26 | −10.3 (2021→2025) improved | → |
149 place 149 on this list national rank 11 of 159 | Vaxholm Stockholms län | 11.9% | better than the national average −27 | −12.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
150 place 150 on this list national rank 10 of 159 | Boxholm Östergötlands län | 11.4% | better than the national average −28 | −13.9 (2023→2025) improved | → |
151 place 151 on this list national rank 8 of 159 | Norsjö Västerbottens län | 11.1% | better than the national average −28 | −6.8 (2023→2025) improved | → |
151 place 151 on this list national rank 8 of 159 | Storuman Västerbottens län | 11.1% | better than the national average −28 | −16.5 (2021→2025) improved | → |
153 place 153 on this list national rank 7 of 159 | Ragunda Jämtlands län | 10.5% | better than the national average −29 | −11.2 (2021→2025) improved | → |
154 place 154 on this list national rank 5 of 159 | Kiruna Norrbottens län | 10.3% | better than the national average −29 | −6.0 (2023→2025) improved | → |
154 place 154 on this list national rank 5 of 159 | Rättvik Dalarnas län | 10.3% | better than the national average −29 | −12.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
156 place 156 on this list national rank 4 of 159 | Gagnef Dalarnas län | 10.2% | better than the national average −29 | −1.6 (2022→2025) improved | → |
157 place 157 on this list national rank 3 of 159 | Jokkmokk Norrbottens län | 9.0% | better than the national average −30 | −16.7 (2021→2025) improved | → |
158 place 158 on this list national rank 2 of 159 | Ydre Östergötlands län | 8.2% | better than the national average −31 | too few years | → |
159 place 159 on this list national rank 1 of 159 | Robertsfors Västerbottens län | 6.7% | better than the national average −33 | −8.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
Does not take part in the survey (131)
131 municipalities have no responses for 2025 and cannot be ranked.
Alingsås Alvesta Älvsbyn Åmål Ånge Arboga Årjäng Arjeplog Arvika Åsele Åtvidaberg Bjurholm Bjuv Bollebygd Bollnäs Borlänge Bräcke Burlöv Dals-Ed Degerfors Dorotea Eda Eksjö Eslöv Fagersta Falkenberg Färgelanda Filipstad Finspång Gotland Grästorp Grums Habo Hagfors Hällefors Halmstad Hammarö Haninge Härjedalen Härryda Hedemora Hjo Hofors Höganäs Högsby Höör Hörby Hultsfred Hylte Kalix Karlsborg Karlshamn Karlskoga Kil Kramfors Kristianstad Krokom Kumla Kungälv Kungsör Laholm Laxå Leksand Lerum Ljusdal Ljusnarsberg Malå Malung-Sälen Mellerud Mönsterås Mora Munkedal Munkfors Nacka Nässjö Nora Norberg Nordanstig Norrköping Norrtälje Öckerö Ödeshög Olofström Örnsköldsvik Orust Osby Östra Göinge Ovanåker Överkalix Övertorneå Pajala Partille Sandviken Sävsjö Sigtuna Simrishamn Skellefteå Skinnskatteberg Smedjebacken Sollefteå Sollentuna Solna Sorsele Sotenäs Stenungsund Stockholm Strömstad Strömsund Surahammar Tibro Tidaholm Tierp Tingsryd Tomelilla Töreboda Torsås Torsby Tranemo Upplands Väsby Uppvidinge Vadstena Vaggeryd Valdemarsvik Vänersborg Vansbro Vårgårda Västerås Vilhelmina Vimmerby Vindeln Vingåker
All 290 municipalities · 159 took part in the 2025 survey
Largest problems by year
| Year | Municipality | Share | Of |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Eskilstuna | 63.3% | 159 |
| 2024 | Säffle | 69.9% | 128 |
| 2023 | Säffle | 69.6% | 162 |
| 2022 | Eskilstuna | 72.3% | 137 |
| 2021 | Perstorp | 71.6% | 161 |
Cite
Source: Statistics Sweden (SCB), Citizen Survey 2025. Analysis: sverige.fyi. https://sverige.fyi/en/rankings/residents-view/most-residents-report-burglary-and-theft-problems
- Statistics Sweden (SCB): open data, free to reuse (CC0).
View on the map
See how the results are distributed geographically on the map