Sverige FYI› Rankings› Residents' view› Safety
Municipalities where most residents feel safe in daylight
Statistics Sweden asks about safety in the neighborhood both after dark and in daylight — the list Municipalities where most residents feel safe builds on the after-dark answers, this one on daylight. Nationally, 96% of residents say they feel safe when it's light out, with answers gathered from 159 municipalities in 2025.
Source: Statistics Sweden, ME0003 Last updated: 2025
96%
national average 2025
159 / 290
municipalities took part
100.0%
highest · Arvidsjaur
Differences are shown in percentage points (pp).
Filters the list by municipality name.
290 municipalities
| # | Municipality | Share feeling safe | vs national average | Trend | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arvidsjaur Norrbottens län | 100.0% | better than the national average +4 | +1.3 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 1 | Piteå Norrbottens län | 100.0% | better than the national average +4 | +2.7 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 1 | Vellinge Skåne län | 100.0% | better than the national average +4 | +1.2 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 4 | Lycksele Västerbottens län | 99.8% | better than the national average +4 | +0.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 5 | Trosa Södermanlands län | 99.6% | better than the national average +4 | +2.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 6 | Boxholm Östergötlands län | 99.5% | better than the national average +4 | +2.3 (2023→2025) improved | → |
| 6 | Jokkmokk Norrbottens län | 99.5% | better than the national average +4 | +0.9 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 6 | Rättvik Dalarnas län | 99.5% | better than the national average +4 | +0.3 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 6 | Vaxholm Stockholms län | 99.5% | better than the national average +4 | +1.6 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 10 | Berg Jämtlands län | 99.4% | better than the national average +4 | +2.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 10 | Båstad Skåne län | 99.4% | better than the national average +4 | +1.3 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 10 | Täby Stockholms län | 99.4% | better than the national average +4 | +2.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 10 | Vännäs Västerbottens län | 99.4% | better than the national average +4 | +1.6 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 14 | Värmdö Stockholms län | 99.3% | better than the national average +4 | +0.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 14 | Åre Jämtlands län | 99.3% | better than the national average +4 | +0.3 (2022→2025) improved | → |
| 16 | Staffanstorp Skåne län | 99.2% | better than the national average +4 | +2.0 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 17 | Danderyd Stockholms län | 99.1% | better than the national average +3 | +0.7 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 17 | Forshaga Värmlands län | 99.1% | better than the national average +3 | +0.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 17 | Gnesta Södermanlands län | 99.1% | better than the national average +3 | +2.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 20 | Nordmaling Västerbottens län | 99.0% | better than the national average +3 | +0.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 20 | Umeå Västerbottens län | 99.0% | better than the national average +3 | +0.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 20 | Älvdalen Dalarnas län | 99.0% | better than the national average +3 | −0.7 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 23 | Lekeberg Örebro län | 98.9% | better than the national average +3 | +0.3 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 23 | Lund Skåne län | 98.9% | better than the national average +3 | +2.2 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 25 | Härnösand Västernorrlands län | 98.8% | better than the national average +3 | +4.5 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 25 | Lidköping Västra Götalands län | 98.8% | better than the national average +3 | +0.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 25 | Sunne Värmlands län | 98.8% | better than the national average +3 | −0.2 (2022→2025) worsened | → |
| 25 | Vallentuna Stockholms län | 98.8% | better than the national average +3 | +1.7 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 25 | Västervik Kalmar län | 98.8% | better than the national average +3 | +2.7 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 25 | Ydre Östergötlands län | 98.8% | better than the national average +3 | too few years | → |
| 31 | Mörbylånga Kalmar län | 98.7% | better than the national average +3 | +0.3 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 31 | Tranås Jönköpings län | 98.7% | better than the national average +3 | +2.9 (2022→2025) improved | → |
| 33 | Askersund Örebro län | 98.6% | better than the national average +3 | too few years | → |
| 33 | Borgholm Kalmar län | 98.6% | better than the national average +3 | +0.3 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 33 | Essunga Västra Götalands län | 98.6% | better than the national average +3 | −0.1 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 33 | Lomma Skåne län | 98.6% | better than the national average +3 | −0.9 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 33 | Söderköping Östergötlands län | 98.6% | better than the national average +3 | too few years | → |
| 38 | Ekerö Stockholms län | 98.5% | better than the national average +3 | −0.4 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 38 | Gagnef Dalarnas län | 98.5% | better than the national average +3 | −0.5 (2022→2025) worsened | → |
| 38 | Mullsjö Jönköpings län | 98.5% | better than the national average +3 | +0.2 (2022→2025) improved | → |
| 38 | Svedala Skåne län | 98.5% | better than the national average +3 | +0.6 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 38 | Östersund Jämtlands län | 98.5% | better than the national average +3 | +2.7 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 43 | Falun Dalarnas län | 98.4% | better than the national average +3 | +1.0 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 43 | Lidingö Stockholms län | 98.4% | better than the national average +3 | +0.3 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 43 | Säter Dalarnas län | 98.4% | better than the national average +3 | ±0.0 (2021→2025) unchanged | → |
| 46 | Gällivare Norrbottens län | 98.3% | better than the national average +3 | −0.7 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 46 | Haparanda Norrbottens län | 98.3% | better than the national average +3 | +5.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 46 | Karlstad Värmlands län | 98.3% | better than the national average +3 | +0.7 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 46 | Kristinehamn Värmlands län | 98.3% | better than the national average +3 | +3.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 46 | Mölndal Västra Götalands län | 98.3% | better than the national average +3 | +3.0 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 46 | Östhammar Uppsala län | 98.3% | better than the national average +3 | −0.4 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 52 | Hudiksvall Gävleborgs län | 98.2% | better than the national average +3 | +1.6 (2022→2025) improved | → |
| 52 | Kungsbacka Hallands län | 98.2% | better than the national average +3 | +0.3 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 52 | Mark Västra Götalands län | 98.2% | better than the national average +3 | too few years | → |
| 52 | Robertsfors Västerbottens län | 98.2% | better than the national average +3 | −0.9 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 52 | Storfors Värmlands län | 98.2% | better than the national average +3 | too few years | → |
| 52 | Varberg Hallands län | 98.2% | better than the national average +3 | −0.5 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 58 | Heby Uppsala län | 98.1% | better than the national average +2 | ±0.0 (2022→2025) unchanged | → |
| 58 | Ragunda Jämtlands län | 98.1% | better than the national average +2 | −0.6 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 58 | Storuman Västerbottens län | 98.1% | better than the national average +2 | −0.1 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 58 | Tjörn Västra Götalands län | 98.1% | better than the national average +2 | −1.1 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 62 | Aneby Jönköpings län | 98.0% | better than the national average +2 | +1.0 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 62 | Jönköping Jönköpings län | 98.0% | better than the national average +2 | +1.5 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 62 | Knivsta Uppsala län | 98.0% | better than the national average +2 | +0.2 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 62 | Luleå Norrbottens län | 98.0% | better than the national average +2 | +1.3 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 66 | Kävlinge Skåne län | 97.9% | better than the national average +2 | +1.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 66 | Ängelholm Skåne län | 97.9% | better than the national average +2 | +1.0 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 66 | Österåker Stockholms län | 97.9% | better than the national average +2 | −1.0 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 69 | Mariestad Västra Götalands län | 97.8% | better than the national average +2 | +0.2 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 69 | Ockelbo Gävleborgs län | 97.8% | better than the national average +2 | +0.6 (2023→2025) improved | → |
| 69 | Ystad Skåne län | 97.8% | better than the national average +2 | +1.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 72 | Gullspång Västra Götalands län | 97.7% | better than the national average +2 | +1.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 72 | Kiruna Norrbottens län | 97.7% | better than the national average +2 | −0.7 (2023→2025) worsened | → |
| 72 | Lilla Edet Västra Götalands län | 97.7% | better than the national average +2 | +3.3 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 72 | Norsjö Västerbottens län | 97.7% | better than the national average +2 | −1.8 (2023→2025) worsened | → |
| 72 | Oxelösund Södermanlands län | 97.7% | better than the national average +2 | too few years | → |
| 72 | Vara Västra Götalands län | 97.7% | better than the national average +2 | +0.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 78 | Enköping Uppsala län | 97.6% | better than the national average +2 | +1.3 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 78 | Herrljunga Västra Götalands län | 97.6% | better than the national average +2 | −0.4 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 80 | Håbo Uppsala län | 97.5% | better than the national average +2 | +1.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 80 | Skövde Västra Götalands län | 97.5% | better than the national average +2 | −0.5 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 82 | Nykvarn Stockholms län | 97.4% | better than the national average +2 | +2.5 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 82 | Tanum Västra Götalands län | 97.4% | better than the national average +2 | −1.0 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 82 | Timrå Västernorrlands län | 97.4% | better than the national average +2 | −0.2 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 82 | Värnamo Jönköpings län | 97.4% | better than the national average +2 | +1.6 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 86 | Ale Västra Götalands län | 97.3% | better than the national average +2 | +1.3 (2023→2025) improved | → |
| 86 | Kinda Östergötlands län | 97.3% | better than the national average +2 | +3.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 86 | Ulricehamn Västra Götalands län | 97.3% | better than the national average +2 | +0.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 89 | Mjölby Östergötlands län | 97.2% | better than the national average +2 | +1.6 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 89 | Sundsvall Västernorrlands län | 97.2% | better than the national average +2 | ±0.0 (2021→2025) unchanged | → |
| 89 | Älvkarleby Uppsala län | 97.2% | better than the national average +2 | too few years | → |
| 92 | Karlskrona Blekinge län | 97.1% | better than the national average +1 | +0.2 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 92 | Svalöv Skåne län | 97.1% | better than the national average +1 | too few years | → |
| 94 | Götene Västra Götalands län | 97.0% | better than the national average +1 | +0.9 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 94 | Nynäshamn Stockholms län | 97.0% | better than the national average +1 | +0.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 94 | Orsa Dalarnas län | 97.0% | better than the national average +1 | +1.9 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 97 | Strängnäs Södermanlands län | 96.9% | better than the national average +1 | +0.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 97 | Örkelljunga Skåne län | 96.9% | better than the national average +1 | +4.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 99 | Sjöbo Skåne län | 96.7% | better than the national average +1 | −0.9 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 99 | Trelleborg Skåne län | 96.7% | better than the national average +1 | +3.2 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 99 | Trollhättan Västra Götalands län | 96.7% | better than the national average +1 | +3.3 (2023→2025) improved | → |
| 102 | Kalmar Kalmar län | 96.6% | better than the national average +1 | −1.2 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 102 | Linköping Östergötlands län | 96.6% | better than the national average +1 | +3.3 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 102 | Ljungby Kronobergs län | 96.6% | better than the national average +1 | +0.5 (2023→2025) improved | → |
| 105 | Ludvika Dalarnas län | 96.4% | better than the national average +1 | +0.6 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 105 | Lysekil Västra Götalands län | 96.4% | better than the national average +1 | +4.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 105 | Sala Västmanlands län | 96.4% | better than the national average +1 | −1.0 (2022→2025) worsened | → |
| 108 | Hallsberg Örebro län | 96.2% | at national average | +1.9 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 108 | Katrineholm Södermanlands län | 96.2% | at national average | +0.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 110 | Avesta Dalarnas län | 96.0% | at national average | +0.7 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 110 | Flen Södermanlands län | 96.0% | at national average | +3.5 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 110 | Oskarshamn Kalmar län | 96.0% | at national average | −0.9 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 110 | Vetlanda Jönköpings län | 96.0% | at national average | +0.9 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 114 | Falköping Västra Götalands län | 95.9% | at national average | +0.5 (2022→2025) improved | → |
| 115 | Upplands-Bro Stockholms län | 95.7% | at national average | +3.5 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 116 | Gnosjö Jönköpings län | 95.6% | at national average | +1.0 (2023→2025) improved | → |
| 116 | Landskrona Skåne län | 95.6% | at national average | +3.0 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 118 | Lindesberg Örebro län | 95.5% | at national average | +0.5 (2023→2025) improved | → |
| 118 | Växjö Kronobergs län | 95.5% | at national average | +3.0 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 120 | Markaryd Kronobergs län | 95.4% | at national average | +6.6 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 120 | Motala Östergötlands län | 95.4% | at national average | +1.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 120 | Nyköping Södermanlands län | 95.4% | at national average | +2.6 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 120 | Skurup Skåne län | 95.4% | at national average | −0.9 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 120 | Uppsala Uppsala län | 95.4% | at national average | +0.2 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 125 | Sundbyberg Stockholms län | 95.3% | at national average | +4.2 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 126 | Boden Norrbottens län | 95.2% | at national average | −1.1 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 127 | Klippan Skåne län | 95.1% | worse than the national average −1 | +2.2 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 127 | Salem Stockholms län | 95.1% | worse than the national average −1 | −0.9 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 127 | Skara Västra Götalands län | 95.1% | worse than the national average −1 | +4.9 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 130 | Tyresö Stockholms län | 94.9% | worse than the national average −1 | −1.2 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 131 | Gislaved Jönköpings län | 94.8% | worse than the national average −1 | −1.1 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 132 | Göteborg Västra Götalands län | 94.7% | worse than the national average −1 | +2.7 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 133 | Helsingborg Skåne län | 94.6% | worse than the national average −1 | +5.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 133 | Sölvesborg Blekinge län | 94.6% | worse than the national average −1 | −1.0 (2022→2025) worsened | → |
| 133 | Älmhult Kronobergs län | 94.6% | worse than the national average −1 | +1.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 136 | Hallstahammar Västmanlands län | 94.5% | worse than the national average −1 | +0.2 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 137 | Köping Västmanlands län | 94.4% | worse than the national average −1 | +1.3 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 138 | Malmö Skåne län | 94.3% | worse than the national average −1 | +5.3 (2022→2025) improved | → |
| 138 | Örebro Örebro län | 94.3% | worse than the national average −1 | −0.3 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 140 | Svenljunga Västra Götalands län | 94.2% | worse than the national average −1 | −3.5 (2023→2025) worsened | → |
| 141 | Bengtsfors Västra Götalands län | 94.1% | worse than the national average −2 | +0.2 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 141 | Säffle Värmlands län | 94.1% | worse than the national average −2 | +1.5 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 143 | Gävle Gävleborgs län | 93.9% | worse than the national average −2 | +2.7 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 144 | Hässleholm Skåne län | 93.8% | worse than the national average −2 | +2.0 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 145 | Uddevalla Västra Götalands län | 93.2% | worse than the national average −2 | +2.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 146 | Bromölla Skåne län | 93.1% | worse than the national average −3 | +3.9 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 147 | Borås Västra Götalands län | 92.8% | worse than the national average −3 | −0.1 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 147 | Åstorp Skåne län | 92.8% | worse than the national average −3 | +2.2 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 149 | Huddinge Stockholms län | 92.7% | worse than the national average −3 | +2.5 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 150 | Nybro Kalmar län | 92.5% | worse than the national average −3 | −1.7 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 151 | Söderhamn Gävleborgs län | 92.4% | worse than the national average −3 | +1.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 152 | Järfälla Stockholms län | 92.3% | worse than the national average −3 | +1.3 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 152 | Lessebo Kronobergs län | 92.3% | worse than the national average −3 | +2.2 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 154 | Emmaboda Kalmar län | 92.1% | worse than the national average −4 | +1.5 (2022→2025) improved | → |
| 155 | Eskilstuna Södermanlands län | 91.0% | worse than the national average −5 | +1.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 156 | Södertälje Stockholms län | 89.4% | worse than the national average −6 | +0.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 157 | Ronneby Blekinge län | 88.9% | worse than the national average −7 | +1.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 158 | Botkyrka Stockholms län | 88.6% | worse than the national average −7 | −1.3 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 159 | Perstorp Skåne län | 85.7% | worse than the national average −10 | +1.7 (2021→2025) improved | → |
Does not take part in the survey (131)
131 municipalities have no responses for 2025 and cannot be ranked.
Alingsås Alvesta Älvsbyn Åmål Ånge Arboga Årjäng Arjeplog Arvika Åsele Åtvidaberg Bjurholm Bjuv Bollebygd Bollnäs Borlänge Bräcke Burlöv Dals-Ed Degerfors Dorotea Eda Eksjö Eslöv Fagersta Falkenberg Färgelanda Filipstad Finspång Gotland Grästorp Grums Habo Hagfors Hällefors Halmstad Hammarö Haninge Härjedalen Härryda Hedemora Hjo Hofors Höganäs Högsby Höör Hörby Hultsfred Hylte Kalix Karlsborg Karlshamn Karlskoga Kil Kramfors Kristianstad Krokom Kumla Kungälv Kungsör Laholm Laxå Leksand Lerum Ljusdal Ljusnarsberg Malå Malung-Sälen Mellerud Mönsterås Mora Munkedal Munkfors Nacka Nässjö Nora Norberg Nordanstig Norrköping Norrtälje Öckerö Ödeshög Olofström Örnsköldsvik Orust Osby Östra Göinge Ovanåker Överkalix Övertorneå Pajala Partille Sandviken Sävsjö Sigtuna Simrishamn Skellefteå Skinnskatteberg Smedjebacken Sollefteå Sollentuna Solna Sorsele Sotenäs Stenungsund Stockholm Strömstad Strömsund Surahammar Tibro Tidaholm Tierp Tingsryd Tomelilla Töreboda Torsås Torsby Tranemo Upplands Väsby Uppvidinge Vadstena Vaggeryd Valdemarsvik Vänersborg Vansbro Vårgårda Västerås Vilhelmina Vimmerby Vindeln Vingåker
All 290 municipalities · 159 took part in the 2025 survey
Best result by year
Cite
Source: Statistics Sweden (SCB), Citizen Survey 2025. Analysis: sverige.fyi. https://sverige.fyi/en/rankings/residents-view/most-residents-feel-safe-in-daylight
- Statistics Sweden (SCB): open data, free to reuse (CC0).
View on the map
See how the results are distributed geographically on the map