Skip to content

Sverige FYI› Rankings› Residents' view› Safety

Municipalities where most residents report drug-trade problems

How much of a problem is drug dealing in the neighborhood where you live? Statistics Sweden puts that question to residents, and this list ranks municipalities by the share who say it is a problem, worst first — a measure of what residents experience, not of reported crime. Across the 159 municipalities that answered in 2025, the national average is 51%.

Source: Statistics Sweden, ME0003 Last updated: 2025

51%
national average 2025
159 / 290
municipalities took part
80.7%
largest problem · Söderhamn

Place 1 is the municipality with the largest problem. The figure beneath it is the national rank, where #1 is always the best result — the same figure shown on the map.

Differences are shown in percentage points (pp).

Filters the list by municipality name.

290 municipalities

Municipalities where most residents report drug-trade problems
PlaceMunicipalityShare seeing a problemvs national averageTrend
1 place 1 on this list
national rank 159 of 159
Söderhamn
Gävleborgs län
80.7%
worse than the national average +30 +0.7 (2021→2025) worsened→
2 place 2 on this list
national rank 158 of 159
Perstorp
Skåne län
79.4%
worse than the national average +29 +0.7 (2021→2025) worsened→
3 place 3 on this list
national rank 157 of 159
Haparanda
Norrbottens län
75.6%
worse than the national average +25 −7.2 (2021→2025) improved→
4 place 4 on this list
national rank 156 of 159
Köping
Västmanlands län
71.1%
worse than the national average +20 −3.8 (2021→2025) improved→
5 place 5 on this list
national rank 155 of 159
Eskilstuna
Södermanlands län
70.9%
worse than the national average +20 −5.1 (2021→2025) improved→
6 place 6 on this list
national rank 154 of 159
Uddevalla
Västra Götalands län
69.6%
worse than the national average +19 −9.1 (2021→2025) improved→
7 place 7 on this list
national rank 153 of 159
Gävle
Gävleborgs län
69.3%
worse than the national average +18 −0.8 (2021→2025) improved→
8 place 8 on this list
national rank 152 of 159
Säffle
Värmlands län
68.8%
worse than the national average +18 +1.0 (2021→2025) worsened→
9 place 9 on this list
national rank 151 of 159
Södertälje
Stockholms län
68.7%
worse than the national average +18 −0.9 (2021→2025) improved→
10 place 10 on this list
national rank 150 of 159
Tranås
Jönköpings län
67.8%
worse than the national average +17 −2.3 (2022→2025) improved→
11 place 11 on this list
national rank 149 of 159
Kristinehamn
Värmlands län
65.9%
worse than the national average +15 −0.7 (2021→2025) improved→
12 place 12 on this list
national rank 148 of 159
Nybro
Kalmar län
65.7%
worse than the national average +15 +4.0 (2021→2025) worsened→
13 place 13 on this list
national rank 147 of 159
Ronneby
Blekinge län
65.6%
worse than the national average +15 −9.5 (2021→2025) improved→
14 place 14 on this list
national rank 146 of 159
Avesta
Dalarnas län
65.0%
worse than the national average +14 +6.0 (2021→2025) worsened→
15 place 15 on this list
national rank 145 of 159
Emmaboda
Kalmar län
63.9%
worse than the national average +13 −6.5 (2022→2025) improved→
16 place 16 on this list
national rank 144 of 159
Gislaved
Jönköpings län
63.8%
worse than the national average +13 −8.3 (2021→2025) improved→
17 place 17 on this list
national rank 143 of 159
Örebro
Örebro län
63.7%
worse than the national average +13 −1.0 (2021→2025) improved→
18 place 18 on this list
national rank 141 of 159
Mjölby
Östergötlands län
63.1%
worse than the national average +12 +10.9 (2021→2025) worsened→
18 place 18 on this list
national rank 141 of 159
Sundsvall
Västernorrlands län
63.1%
worse than the national average +12 ±0.0 (2021→2025) unchanged→
20 place 20 on this list
national rank 140 of 159
Hudiksvall
Gävleborgs län
62.2%
worse than the national average +11 −2.8 (2022→2025) improved→
21 place 21 on this list
national rank 139 of 159
Helsingborg
Skåne län
61.8%
worse than the national average +11 −8.5 (2021→2025) improved→
22 place 22 on this list
national rank 138 of 159
Hässleholm
Skåne län
61.4%
worse than the national average +11 −9.3 (2021→2025) improved→
23 place 23 on this list
national rank 137 of 159
Åstorp
Skåne län
61.3%
worse than the national average +10 −12.8 (2021→2025) improved→
24 place 24 on this list
national rank 136 of 159
Borås
Västra Götalands län
60.6%
worse than the national average +10 −9.8 (2021→2025) improved→
25 place 25 on this list
national rank 135 of 159
Falköping
Västra Götalands län
60.4%
worse than the national average +10 −0.2 (2022→2025) improved→
26 place 26 on this list
national rank 134 of 159
Skara
Västra Götalands län
60.2%
worse than the national average +9 −9.0 (2021→2025) improved→
27 place 27 on this list
national rank 133 of 159
Bromölla
Skåne län
59.9%
worse than the national average +9 −12.6 (2021→2025) improved→
28 place 28 on this list
national rank 132 of 159
Ludvika
Dalarnas län
59.6%
worse than the national average +9 −7.0 (2021→2025) improved→
29 place 29 on this list
national rank 130 of 159
Malmö
Skåne län
59.5%
worse than the national average +9 −10.9 (2022→2025) improved→
29 place 29 on this list
national rank 130 of 159
Motala
Östergötlands län
59.5%
worse than the national average +9 +7.3 (2021→2025) worsened→
31 place 31 on this list
national rank 128 of 159
Göteborg
Västra Götalands län
59.0%
worse than the national average +8 −9.9 (2021→2025) improved→
31 place 31 on this list
national rank 128 of 159
Uppsala
Uppsala län
59.0%
worse than the national average +8 −0.4 (2021→2025) improved→
33 place 33 on this list
national rank 127 of 159
Sölvesborg
Blekinge län
57.8%
worse than the national average +7 −10.5 (2022→2025) improved→
34 place 34 on this list
national rank 126 of 159
Hallstahammar
Västmanlands län
57.0%
worse than the national average +6 −1.2 (2021→2025) improved→
35 place 35 on this list
national rank 125 of 159
Skurup
Skåne län
56.7%
worse than the national average +6 −8.9 (2021→2025) improved→
36 place 36 on this list
national rank 124 of 159
Värnamo
Jönköpings län
56.3%
worse than the national average +5 −19.2 (2021→2025) improved→
37 place 37 on this list
national rank 123 of 159
Örkelljunga
Skåne län
56.2%
worse than the national average +5 −4.4 (2021→2025) improved→
38 place 38 on this list
national rank 121 of 159
Orsa
Dalarnas län
56.0%
worse than the national average +5 −4.4 (2021→2025) improved→
38 place 38 on this list
national rank 121 of 159
Trollhättan
Västra Götalands län
56.0%
worse than the national average +5 −15.6 (2023→2025) improved→
40 place 40 on this list
national rank 120 of 159
Boden
Norrbottens län
55.8%
worse than the national average +5 −12.4 (2021→2025) improved→
41 place 41 on this list
national rank 119 of 159
Nyköping
Södermanlands län
55.6%
worse than the national average +5 +3.5 (2021→2025) worsened→
42 place 42 on this list
national rank 118 of 159
Lysekil
Västra Götalands län
55.5%
worse than the national average +5 −13.6 (2021→2025) improved→
43 place 43 on this list
national rank 116 of 159
Botkyrka
Stockholms län
55.1%
worse than the national average +4 −7.9 (2021→2025) improved→
43 place 43 on this list
national rank 116 of 159
Järfälla
Stockholms län
55.1%
worse than the national average +4 −7.4 (2021→2025) improved→
45 place 45 on this list
national rank 115 of 159
Växjö
Kronobergs län
54.8%
worse than the national average +4 −7.0 (2021→2025) improved→
46 place 46 on this list
national rank 113 of 159
Härnösand
Västernorrlands län
54.5%
worse than the national average +4 −7.6 (2021→2025) improved→
46 place 46 on this list
national rank 113 of 159
Lidköping
Västra Götalands län
54.5%
worse than the national average +4 −1.9 (2021→2025) improved→
48 place 48 on this list
national rank 111 of 159
Katrineholm
Södermanlands län
54.4%
worse than the national average +4 −4.8 (2021→2025) improved→
48 place 48 on this list
national rank 111 of 159
Vetlanda
Jönköpings län
54.4%
worse than the national average +4 −8.0 (2021→2025) improved→
50 place 50 on this list
national rank 110 of 159
Östersund
Jämtlands län
54.0%
worse than the national average +3 −5.8 (2021→2025) improved→
51 place 51 on this list
national rank 109 of 159
Lindesberg
Örebro län
53.7%
worse than the national average +3 −15.4 (2023→2025) improved→
52 place 52 on this list
national rank 108 of 159
Strängnäs
Södermanlands län
53.5%
worse than the national average +3 −4.1 (2021→2025) improved→
53 place 53 on this list
national rank 107 of 159
Linköping
Östergötlands län
53.3%
worse than the national average +2 −14.1 (2021→2025) improved→
54 place 54 on this list
national rank 106 of 159
Ulricehamn
Västra Götalands län
52.7%
worse than the national average +2 −0.4 (2021→2025) improved→
55 place 55 on this list
national rank 105 of 159
Mark
Västra Götalands län
52.6%
worse than the national average +2too few years→
56 place 56 on this list
national rank 104 of 159
Flen
Södermanlands län
52.2%
worse than the national average +1 +0.4 (2021→2025) worsened→
57 place 57 on this list
national rank 103 of 159
Svenljunga
Västra Götalands län
51.8%
worse than the national average +1 +7.3 (2023→2025) worsened→
58 place 58 on this list
national rank 102 of 159
Älvkarleby
Uppsala län
51.6%
worse than the national average +1too few years→
59 place 59 on this list
national rank 101 of 159
Gällivare
Norrbottens län
51.1%
at national average −10.2 (2021→2025) improved→
60 place 60 on this list
national rank 100 of 159
Karlstad
Värmlands län
50.9%
at national average +4.5 (2021→2025) worsened→
61 place 61 on this list
national rank 99 of 159
Västervik
Kalmar län
50.2%
better than the national average −1 −7.7 (2021→2025) improved→
62 place 62 on this list
national rank 97 of 159
Hallsberg
Örebro län
50.1%
better than the national average −1 +4.0 (2021→2025) worsened→
62 place 62 on this list
national rank 97 of 159
Markaryd
Kronobergs län
50.1%
better than the national average −1 −1.6 (2021→2025) improved→
64 place 64 on this list
national rank 96 of 159
Trelleborg
Skåne län
50.0%
better than the national average −1 −6.6 (2021→2025) improved→
65 place 65 on this list
national rank 95 of 159
Enköping
Uppsala län
49.4%
better than the national average −1 −1.7 (2021→2025) improved→
66 place 66 on this list
national rank 94 of 159
Oskarshamn
Kalmar län
49.1%
better than the national average −2 −7.1 (2021→2025) improved→
67 place 67 on this list
national rank 93 of 159
Mariestad
Västra Götalands län
48.2%
better than the national average −3 −19.6 (2021→2025) improved→
68 place 68 on this list
national rank 92 of 159
Älmhult
Kronobergs län
47.8%
better than the national average −3 +2.5 (2021→2025) worsened→
69 place 69 on this list
national rank 90 of 159
Sala
Västmanlands län
47.7%
better than the national average −3 −4.0 (2022→2025) improved→
69 place 69 on this list
national rank 90 of 159
Upplands-Bro
Stockholms län
47.7%
better than the national average −3 −13.7 (2021→2025) improved→
71 place 71 on this list
national rank 88 of 159
Kalmar
Kalmar län
47.6%
better than the national average −3 −10.6 (2021→2025) improved→
71 place 71 on this list
national rank 88 of 159
Lilla Edet
Västra Götalands län
47.6%
better than the national average −3 −12.6 (2021→2025) improved→
73 place 73 on this list
national rank 87 of 159
Kungsbacka
Hallands län
47.5%
better than the national average −3 +3.9 (2021→2025) worsened→
74 place 74 on this list
national rank 86 of 159
Håbo
Uppsala län
47.1%
better than the national average −4 −16.1 (2021→2025) improved→
75 place 75 on this list
national rank 85 of 159
Klippan
Skåne län
47.0%
better than the national average −4 −2.7 (2021→2025) improved→
76 place 76 on this list
national rank 82 of 159
Landskrona
Skåne län
46.8%
better than the national average −4 −18.0 (2021→2025) improved→
76 place 76 on this list
national rank 82 of 159
Timrå
Västernorrlands län
46.8%
better than the national average −4 −8.3 (2021→2025) improved→
76 place 76 on this list
national rank 82 of 159
Tyresö
Stockholms län
46.8%
better than the national average −4 +3.7 (2021→2025) worsened→
79 place 79 on this list
national rank 81 of 159
Ystad
Skåne län
46.3%
better than the national average −5 −7.1 (2021→2025) improved→
80 place 80 on this list
national rank 80 of 159
Ale
Västra Götalands län
46.2%
better than the national average −5 −12.8 (2023→2025) improved→
81 place 81 on this list
national rank 79 of 159
Piteå
Norrbottens län
45.2%
better than the national average −6 −12.5 (2021→2025) improved→
82 place 82 on this list
national rank 78 of 159
Ljungby
Kronobergs län
45.1%
better than the national average −6 −8.2 (2023→2025) improved→
83 place 83 on this list
national rank 77 of 159
Salem
Stockholms län
44.6%
better than the national average −6 −8.7 (2021→2025) improved→
84 place 84 on this list
national rank 76 of 159
Götene
Västra Götalands län
44.4%
better than the national average −6 −1.4 (2021→2025) improved→
85 place 85 on this list
national rank 75 of 159
Lycksele
Västerbottens län
43.7%
better than the national average −7 +1.3 (2021→2025) worsened→
86 place 86 on this list
national rank 74 of 159
Skövde
Västra Götalands län
43.6%
better than the national average −7 −4.0 (2021→2025) improved→
87 place 87 on this list
national rank 73 of 159
Oxelösund
Södermanlands län
43.2%
better than the national average −8too few years→
88 place 88 on this list
national rank 72 of 159
Gnosjö
Jönköpings län
42.9%
better than the national average −8 −22.2 (2023→2025) improved→
89 place 89 on this list
national rank 70 of 159
Huddinge
Stockholms län
42.8%
better than the national average −8 −16.6 (2021→2025) improved→
89 place 89 on this list
national rank 70 of 159
Vara
Västra Götalands län
42.8%
better than the national average −8 −12.3 (2021→2025) improved→
91 place 91 on this list
national rank 69 of 159
Mullsjö
Jönköpings län
42.4%
better than the national average −8 −14.9 (2022→2025) improved→
92 place 92 on this list
national rank 68 of 159
Ockelbo
Gävleborgs län
42.2%
better than the national average −9 −11.0 (2023→2025) improved→
93 place 93 on this list
national rank 67 of 159
Ängelholm
Skåne län
41.3%
better than the national average −10 −2.9 (2021→2025) improved→
94 place 94 on this list
national rank 66 of 159
Falun
Dalarnas län
41.0%
better than the national average −10 −2.2 (2021→2025) improved→
95 place 95 on this list
national rank 65 of 159
Sundbyberg
Stockholms län
40.6%
better than the national average −10 −3.5 (2021→2025) improved→
96 place 96 on this list
national rank 63 of 159
Heby
Uppsala län
40.0%
better than the national average −11 −10.8 (2022→2025) improved→
96 place 96 on this list
national rank 63 of 159
Nykvarn
Stockholms län
40.0%
better than the national average −11 −5.9 (2021→2025) improved→
98 place 98 on this list
national rank 62 of 159
Nynäshamn
Stockholms län
39.4%
better than the national average −11 −8.8 (2021→2025) improved→
99 place 99 on this list
national rank 61 of 159
Boxholm
Östergötlands län
39.2%
better than the national average −12 −7.8 (2023→2025) improved→
100 place 100 on this list
national rank 60 of 159
Sunne
Värmlands län
38.8%
better than the national average −12 +1.9 (2022→2025) worsened→
101 place 101 on this list
national rank 59 of 159
Gullspång
Västra Götalands län
38.7%
better than the national average −12 −17.1 (2021→2025) improved→
102 place 102 on this list
national rank 58 of 159
Åre
Jämtlands län
38.5%
better than the national average −12 +4.3 (2022→2025) worsened→
103 place 103 on this list
national rank 56 of 159
Karlskrona
Blekinge län
38.4%
better than the national average −12 −8.8 (2021→2025) improved→
103 place 103 on this list
national rank 56 of 159
Östhammar
Uppsala län
38.4%
better than the national average −12 −5.5 (2021→2025) improved→
105 place 105 on this list
national rank 55 of 159
Vännäs
Västerbottens län
37.2%
better than the national average −14 +9.8 (2021→2025) worsened→
106 place 106 on this list
national rank 53 of 159
Jönköping
Jönköpings län
37.0%
better than the national average −14 −12.8 (2021→2025) improved→
106 place 106 on this list
national rank 53 of 159
Lessebo
Kronobergs län
37.0%
better than the national average −14 −9.3 (2021→2025) improved→
108 place 108 on this list
national rank 52 of 159
Kiruna
Norrbottens län
36.9%
better than the national average −14 −6.8 (2023→2025) improved→
109 place 109 on this list
national rank 51 of 159
Mölndal
Västra Götalands län
36.7%
better than the national average −14 −5.8 (2021→2025) improved→
110 place 110 on this list
national rank 50 of 159
Österåker
Stockholms län
36.4%
better than the national average −14 −20.2 (2021→2025) improved→
111 place 111 on this list
national rank 49 of 159
Bengtsfors
Västra Götalands län
36.2%
better than the national average −15 −19.3 (2021→2025) improved→
112 place 112 on this list
national rank 48 of 159
Sjöbo
Skåne län
35.3%
better than the national average −16 −4.9 (2021→2025) improved→
113 place 113 on this list
national rank 47 of 159
Umeå
Västerbottens län
34.9%
better than the national average −16 −9.6 (2021→2025) improved→
114 place 114 on this list
national rank 45 of 159
Askersund
Örebro län
34.5%
better than the national average −16too few years→
114 place 114 on this list
national rank 45 of 159
Gnesta
Södermanlands län
34.5%
better than the national average −16 −14.9 (2021→2025) improved→
116 place 116 on this list
national rank 44 of 159
Luleå
Norrbottens län
34.2%
better than the national average −17 −19.1 (2021→2025) improved→
117 place 117 on this list
national rank 43 of 159
Trosa
Södermanlands län
34.1%
better than the national average −17 −8.3 (2021→2025) improved→
118 place 118 on this list
national rank 42 of 159
Aneby
Jönköpings län
32.7%
better than the national average −18 −12.4 (2021→2025) improved→
119 place 119 on this list
national rank 41 of 159
Storuman
Västerbottens län
32.4%
better than the national average −18 +6.4 (2021→2025) worsened→
120 place 120 on this list
national rank 39 of 159
Arvidsjaur
Norrbottens län
32.0%
better than the national average −19 −5.8 (2021→2025) improved→
120 place 120 on this list
national rank 39 of 159
Herrljunga
Västra Götalands län
32.0%
better than the national average −19 −26.4 (2021→2025) improved→
122 place 122 on this list
national rank 38 of 159
Söderköping
Östergötlands län
31.1%
better than the national average −20too few years→
123 place 123 on this list
national rank 37 of 159
Älvdalen
Dalarnas län
30.9%
better than the national average −20 +2.8 (2021→2025) worsened→
124 place 124 on this list
national rank 36 of 159
Säter
Dalarnas län
30.1%
better than the national average −21 +4.8 (2021→2025) worsened→
125 place 125 on this list
national rank 35 of 159
Tanum
Västra Götalands län
29.6%
better than the national average −21 −13.4 (2021→2025) improved→
126 place 126 on this list
national rank 33 of 159
Essunga
Västra Götalands län
29.1%
better than the national average −22 −8.6 (2021→2025) improved→
126 place 126 on this list
national rank 33 of 159
Tjörn
Västra Götalands län
29.1%
better than the national average −22 −5.2 (2021→2025) improved→
128 place 128 on this list
national rank 32 of 159
Svedala
Skåne län
28.6%
better than the national average −22 −24.8 (2021→2025) improved→
129 place 129 on this list
national rank 31 of 159
Kävlinge
Skåne län
28.4%
better than the national average −22 −3.4 (2021→2025) improved→
130 place 130 on this list
national rank 30 of 159
Varberg
Hallands län
28.3%
better than the national average −23 −14.1 (2021→2025) improved→
131 place 131 on this list
national rank 29 of 159
Knivsta
Uppsala län
27.8%
better than the national average −23 −8.7 (2021→2025) improved→
132 place 132 on this list
national rank 28 of 159
Vallentuna
Stockholms län
27.4%
better than the national average −23 −13.1 (2021→2025) improved→
133 place 133 on this list
national rank 27 of 159
Lund
Skåne län
27.3%
better than the national average −24 −6.0 (2021→2025) improved→
134 place 134 on this list
national rank 26 of 159
Svalöv
Skåne län
26.7%
better than the national average −24too few years→
135 place 135 on this list
national rank 25 of 159
Forshaga
Värmlands län
26.6%
better than the national average −24 −30.6 (2021→2025) improved→
136 place 136 on this list
national rank 24 of 159
Storfors
Värmlands län
26.4%
better than the national average −24too few years→
137 place 137 on this list
national rank 23 of 159
Rättvik
Dalarnas län
25.8%
better than the national average −25 −1.4 (2021→2025) improved→
138 place 138 on this list
national rank 22 of 159
Värmdö
Stockholms län
25.7%
better than the national average −25 −17.8 (2021→2025) improved→
139 place 139 on this list
national rank 20 of 159
Berg
Jämtlands län
25.6%
better than the national average −25 +0.3 (2021→2025) worsened→
139 place 139 on this list
national rank 20 of 159
Lekeberg
Örebro län
25.6%
better than the national average −25 −25.8 (2021→2025) improved→
141 place 141 on this list
national rank 19 of 159
Kinda
Östergötlands län
24.5%
better than the national average −26 −17.6 (2021→2025) improved→
142 place 142 on this list
national rank 18 of 159
Nordmaling
Västerbottens län
24.3%
better than the national average −27 −13.7 (2021→2025) improved→
143 place 143 on this list
national rank 17 of 159
Staffanstorp
Skåne län
23.9%
better than the national average −27 −13.7 (2021→2025) improved→
144 place 144 on this list
national rank 16 of 159
Ekerö
Stockholms län
23.8%
better than the national average −27 −13.0 (2021→2025) improved→
145 place 145 on this list
national rank 15 of 159
Borgholm
Kalmar län
23.6%
better than the national average −27 +2.9 (2021→2025) worsened→
146 place 146 on this list
national rank 13 of 159
Ragunda
Jämtlands län
23.5%
better than the national average −27 −1.5 (2021→2025) improved→
146 place 146 on this list
national rank 13 of 159
Robertsfors
Västerbottens län
23.5%
better than the national average −27 +3.8 (2021→2025) worsened→
148 place 148 on this list
national rank 12 of 159
Vellinge
Skåne län
22.8%
better than the national average −28 −13.4 (2021→2025) improved→
149 place 149 on this list
national rank 10 of 159
Lomma
Skåne län
20.6%
better than the national average −30 +5.1 (2021→2025) worsened→
149 place 149 on this list
national rank 10 of 159
Täby
Stockholms län
20.6%
better than the national average −30 −5.9 (2021→2025) improved→
151 place 151 on this list
national rank 9 of 159
Båstad
Skåne län
20.3%
better than the national average −31 −11.2 (2021→2025) improved→
152 place 152 on this list
national rank 8 of 159
Lidingö
Stockholms län
18.2%
better than the national average −33 −14.0 (2021→2025) improved→
153 place 153 on this list
national rank 7 of 159
Jokkmokk
Norrbottens län
17.3%
better than the national average −34 −24.2 (2021→2025) improved→
154 place 154 on this list
national rank 6 of 159
Norsjö
Västerbottens län
15.2%
better than the national average −36 −7.7 (2023→2025) improved→
155 place 155 on this list
national rank 5 of 159
Danderyd
Stockholms län
14.9%
better than the national average −36 −14.7 (2021→2025) improved→
156 place 156 on this list
national rank 4 of 159
Mörbylånga
Kalmar län
13.8%
better than the national average −37 −6.9 (2021→2025) improved→
157 place 157 on this list
national rank 3 of 159
Gagnef
Dalarnas län
10.4%
better than the national average −40 −6.0 (2022→2025) improved→
158 place 158 on this list
national rank 2 of 159
Vaxholm
Stockholms län
7.6%
better than the national average −43 −13.2 (2021→2025) improved→
159 place 159 on this list
national rank 1 of 159
Ydre
Östergötlands län
6.3%
better than the national average −45too few years→

Does not take part in the survey (131)

131 municipalities have no responses for 2025 and cannot be ranked.

Alingsås Alvesta Älvsbyn Åmål Ånge Arboga Årjäng Arjeplog Arvika Åsele Åtvidaberg Bjurholm Bjuv Bollebygd Bollnäs Borlänge Bräcke Burlöv Dals-Ed Degerfors Dorotea Eda Eksjö Eslöv Fagersta Falkenberg Färgelanda Filipstad Finspång Gotland Grästorp Grums Habo Hagfors Hällefors Halmstad Hammarö Haninge Härjedalen Härryda Hedemora Hjo Hofors Höganäs Högsby Höör Hörby Hultsfred Hylte Kalix Karlsborg Karlshamn Karlskoga Kil Kramfors Kristianstad Krokom Kumla Kungälv Kungsör Laholm Laxå Leksand Lerum Ljusdal Ljusnarsberg Malå Malung-Sälen Mellerud Mönsterås Mora Munkedal Munkfors Nacka Nässjö Nora Norberg Nordanstig Norrköping Norrtälje Öckerö Ödeshög Olofström Örnsköldsvik Orust Osby Östra Göinge Ovanåker Överkalix Övertorneå Pajala Partille Sandviken Sävsjö Sigtuna Simrishamn Skellefteå Skinnskatteberg Smedjebacken Sollefteå Sollentuna Solna Sorsele Sotenäs Stenungsund Stockholm Strömstad Strömsund Surahammar Tibro Tidaholm Tierp Tingsryd Tomelilla Töreboda Torsås Torsby Tranemo Upplands Väsby Uppvidinge Vadstena Vaggeryd Valdemarsvik Vänersborg Vansbro Vårgårda Västerås Vilhelmina Vimmerby Vindeln Vingåker

All 290 municipalities · 159 took part in the 2025 survey

Largest problems by year

YearMunicipalityShareOf
2025Söderhamn80.7%159
2024Haparanda79.0%128
2023Söderhamn85.8%162
2022Eskilstuna82.7%137
2021Haparanda82.8%161
Cite

Source: Statistics Sweden (SCB), Citizen Survey 2025. Analysis: sverige.fyi. https://sverige.fyi/en/rankings/residents-view/most-residents-report-drug-trade-problems

  • Statistics Sweden (SCB): open data, free to reuse (CC0).
View on the map

See how the results are distributed geographically on the map