Skip to content

Sverige FYI› Rankings› Residents' view› Nature & Leisure

Municipalities where most residents are satisfied with outdoor areas

The question concerns the supply of outdoor recreation areas in the municipality, one of five options in Statistics Sweden's section on sports and outdoor life. As elsewhere in the survey, participation varies from year to year; in 2025 it stood at 159 municipalities, with 88% satisfied nationally.

Source: Statistics Sweden, ME0003 Last updated: 2025

88%
national average 2025
159 / 290
municipalities took part
97.1%
highest · Tyresö

Differences are shown in percentage points (pp).

Filters the list by municipality name.

290 municipalities

Municipalities where most residents are satisfied with outdoor areas
#MunicipalityShare satisfiedvs national averageTrend
1
Tyresö
Stockholms län
97.1%
better than the national average +9 +0.1 (2021→2025) improved→
2
Falun
Dalarnas län
96.4%
better than the national average +9 +1.8 (2021→2025) improved→
2
Lidingö
Stockholms län
96.4%
better than the national average +9 ±0.0 (2021→2025) unchanged→
4
Vaxholm
Stockholms län
96.1%
better than the national average +8 +1.6 (2021→2025) improved→
5
Båstad
Skåne län
94.6%
better than the national average +7 +3.2 (2021→2025) improved→
6
Aneby
Jönköpings län
94.4%
better than the national average +7 +0.6 (2021→2025) improved→
7
Åre
Jämtlands län
93.9%
better than the national average +6 −1.2 (2022→2025) worsened→
7
Östersund
Jämtlands län
93.9%
better than the national average +6 +1.3 (2021→2025) improved→
9
Jokkmokk
Norrbottens län
93.6%
better than the national average +6 +4.4 (2021→2025) improved→
10
Borås
Västra Götalands län
93.5%
better than the national average +6 +0.2 (2021→2025) improved→
10
Gnosjö
Jönköpings län
93.5%
better than the national average +6 +4.4 (2023→2025) improved→
10
Ulricehamn
Västra Götalands län
93.5%
better than the national average +6 +1.3 (2021→2025) improved→
13
Jönköping
Jönköpings län
93.3%
better than the national average +5 +3.5 (2021→2025) improved→
13
Värmdö
Stockholms län
93.3%
better than the national average +5 +4.8 (2021→2025) improved→
15
Danderyd
Stockholms län
93.2%
better than the national average +5 +0.1 (2021→2025) improved→
15
Mullsjö
Jönköpings län
93.2%
better than the national average +5 −2.6 (2022→2025) worsened→
15
Sölvesborg
Blekinge län
93.2%
better than the national average +5 +2.7 (2022→2025) improved→
18
Trollhättan
Västra Götalands län
93.0%
better than the national average +5 +1.4 (2023→2025) improved→
19
Kristinehamn
Värmlands län
92.8%
better than the national average +5 +1.7 (2021→2025) improved→
19
Växjö
Kronobergs län
92.8%
better than the national average +5 +3.5 (2021→2025) improved→
21
Trosa
Södermanlands län
92.7%
better than the national average +5 +1.4 (2021→2025) improved→
21
Ängelholm
Skåne län
92.7%
better than the national average +5 +5.3 (2021→2025) improved→
23
Boxholm
Östergötlands län
92.6%
better than the national average +5 +3.3 (2023→2025) improved→
24
Vännäs
Västerbottens län
92.4%
better than the national average +5 +9.6 (2021→2025) improved→
24
Ydre
Östergötlands län
92.4%
better than the national average +5too few years→
26
Upplands-Bro
Stockholms län
92.3%
better than the national average +4 +4.0 (2021→2025) improved→
27
Botkyrka
Stockholms län
92.2%
better than the national average +4 +1.4 (2021→2025) improved→
27
Skövde
Västra Götalands län
92.2%
better than the national average +4 +1.5 (2021→2025) improved→
29
Nybro
Kalmar län
92.0%
better than the national average +4 −3.7 (2021→2025) worsened→
30
Sundsvall
Västernorrlands län
91.8%
better than the national average +4 +3.9 (2021→2025) improved→
31
Ockelbo
Gävleborgs län
91.7%
better than the national average +4 +5.3 (2023→2025) improved→
31
Täby
Stockholms län
91.7%
better than the national average +4 −1.9 (2021→2025) worsened→
33
Oxelösund
Södermanlands län
91.6%
better than the national average +4too few years→
33
Österåker
Stockholms län
91.6%
better than the national average +4 −0.4 (2021→2025) worsened→
35
Knivsta
Uppsala län
91.5%
better than the national average +4 +9.6 (2021→2025) improved→
36
Lycksele
Västerbottens län
91.4%
better than the national average +4 +5.7 (2021→2025) improved→
37
Borgholm
Kalmar län
91.3%
better than the national average +3 +3.6 (2021→2025) improved→
37
Enköping
Uppsala län
91.3%
better than the national average +3 +5.1 (2021→2025) improved→
39
Motala
Östergötlands län
91.1%
better than the national average +3 +3.8 (2021→2025) improved→
40
Härnösand
Västernorrlands län
91.0%
better than the national average +3 −2.1 (2021→2025) worsened→
40
Västervik
Kalmar län
91.0%
better than the national average +3 −2.1 (2021→2025) worsened→
42
Rättvik
Dalarnas län
90.9%
better than the national average +3 −5.7 (2021→2025) worsened→
42
Sjöbo
Skåne län
90.9%
better than the national average +3 −0.7 (2021→2025) worsened→
44
Mölndal
Västra Götalands län
90.8%
better than the national average +3 +0.5 (2021→2025) improved→
45
Örebro
Örebro län
90.6%
better than the national average +3 −0.9 (2021→2025) worsened→
46
Herrljunga
Västra Götalands län
90.5%
better than the national average +3 +5.0 (2021→2025) improved→
46
Karlstad
Värmlands län
90.5%
better than the national average +3 −0.1 (2021→2025) worsened→
46
Linköping
Östergötlands län
90.5%
better than the national average +3 +1.4 (2021→2025) improved→
49
Luleå
Norrbottens län
90.4%
better than the national average +3 −0.9 (2021→2025) worsened→
50
Timrå
Västernorrlands län
90.3%
better than the national average +2 +0.4 (2021→2025) improved→
51
Lidköping
Västra Götalands län
90.2%
better than the national average +2 +5.4 (2021→2025) improved→
51
Orsa
Dalarnas län
90.2%
better than the national average +2 −0.3 (2021→2025) worsened→
53
Söderköping
Östergötlands län
90.1%
better than the national average +2too few years→
53
Tranås
Jönköpings län
90.1%
better than the national average +2 −2.5 (2022→2025) worsened→
55
Ekerö
Stockholms län
89.9%
better than the national average +2 −3.5 (2021→2025) worsened→
56
Falköping
Västra Götalands län
89.8%
better than the national average +2 −3.3 (2022→2025) worsened→
57
Vetlanda
Jönköpings län
89.7%
better than the national average +2 +4.9 (2021→2025) improved→
58
Håbo
Uppsala län
89.6%
better than the national average +2 +2.8 (2021→2025) improved→
58
Mark
Västra Götalands län
89.6%
better than the national average +2too few years→
58
Värnamo
Jönköpings län
89.6%
better than the national average +2 +0.3 (2021→2025) improved→
61
Vallentuna
Stockholms län
89.5%
better than the national average +2 −0.3 (2021→2025) worsened→
62
Huddinge
Stockholms län
89.4%
better than the national average +2 +4.2 (2021→2025) improved→
62
Kalmar
Kalmar län
89.4%
better than the national average +2 +4.2 (2021→2025) improved→
62
Sundbyberg
Stockholms län
89.4%
better than the national average +2 +0.3 (2021→2025) improved→
65
Hallstahammar
Västmanlands län
89.3%
better than the national average +1 −2.2 (2021→2025) worsened→
65
Umeå
Västerbottens län
89.3%
better than the national average +1 +1.7 (2021→2025) improved→
67
Forshaga
Värmlands län
89.2%
better than the national average +1 −0.4 (2021→2025) worsened→
67
Götene
Västra Götalands län
89.2%
better than the national average +1 −0.8 (2021→2025) worsened→
69
Klippan
Skåne län
89.1%
better than the national average +1 −0.1 (2021→2025) worsened→
69
Sunne
Värmlands län
89.1%
better than the national average +1 +2.5 (2022→2025) improved→
69
Uppsala
Uppsala län
89.1%
better than the national average +1 +0.7 (2021→2025) improved→
72
Nyköping
Södermanlands län
88.7%
better than the national average +1 +0.5 (2021→2025) improved→
73
Nordmaling
Västerbottens län
88.5%
better than the national average +1 +10.3 (2021→2025) improved→
74
Ystad
Skåne län
88.4%
at national average +1.1 (2021→2025) improved→
75
Järfälla
Stockholms län
88.3%
at national average −6.1 (2021→2025) worsened→
75
Ronneby
Blekinge län
88.3%
at national average −0.6 (2021→2025) worsened→
77
Göteborg
Västra Götalands län
88.2%
at national average −3.0 (2021→2025) worsened→
78
Perstorp
Skåne län
88.1%
at national average +1.0 (2021→2025) improved→
78
Säffle
Värmlands län
88.1%
at national average −0.9 (2021→2025) worsened→
78
Älmhult
Kronobergs län
88.1%
at national average +5.7 (2021→2025) improved→
81
Avesta
Dalarnas län
88.0%
at national average +3.7 (2021→2025) improved→
82
Sala
Västmanlands län
87.9%
at national average −5.0 (2022→2025) worsened→
82
Örkelljunga
Skåne län
87.9%
at national average +1.6 (2021→2025) improved→
84
Gnesta
Södermanlands län
87.8%
at national average +0.2 (2021→2025) improved→
84
Karlskrona
Blekinge län
87.8%
at national average +1.3 (2021→2025) improved→
84
Nynäshamn
Stockholms län
87.8%
at national average −6.1 (2021→2025) worsened→
87
Varberg
Hallands län
87.7%
at national average +3.3 (2021→2025) improved→
88
Hudiksvall
Gävleborgs län
87.6%
at national average +3.3 (2022→2025) improved→
88
Svedala
Skåne län
87.6%
at national average +4.7 (2021→2025) improved→
88
Älvdalen
Dalarnas län
87.6%
at national average −1.5 (2021→2025) worsened→
91
Arvidsjaur
Norrbottens län
87.5%
at national average −2.5 (2021→2025) worsened→
92
Piteå
Norrbottens län
87.4%
at national average +2.1 (2021→2025) improved→
93
Älvkarleby
Uppsala län
87.3%
worse than the national average −1too few years→
94
Gagnef
Dalarnas län
87.1%
worse than the national average −1 −4.2 (2022→2025) worsened→
94
Oskarshamn
Kalmar län
87.1%
worse than the national average −1 −3.2 (2021→2025) worsened→
94
Storfors
Värmlands län
87.1%
worse than the national average −1too few years→
97
Gullspång
Västra Götalands län
87.0%
worse than the national average −1 +5.1 (2021→2025) improved→
98
Storuman
Västerbottens län
86.8%
worse than the national average −1 −4.0 (2021→2025) worsened→
98
Strängnäs
Södermanlands län
86.8%
worse than the national average −1 +5.5 (2021→2025) improved→
98
Tjörn
Västra Götalands län
86.8%
worse than the national average −1 +1.9 (2021→2025) improved→
101
Mjölby
Östergötlands län
86.5%
worse than the national average −1 −0.7 (2021→2025) worsened→
102
Kävlinge
Skåne län
86.3%
worse than the national average −2 −2.1 (2021→2025) worsened→
102
Säter
Dalarnas län
86.3%
worse than the national average −2 −5.2 (2021→2025) worsened→
104
Bromölla
Skåne län
86.1%
worse than the national average −2 −1.8 (2021→2025) worsened→
105
Eskilstuna
Södermanlands län
85.7%
worse than the national average −2 −3.2 (2021→2025) worsened→
106
Markaryd
Kronobergs län
85.4%
worse than the national average −2 +7.4 (2021→2025) improved→
107
Gävle
Gävleborgs län
85.3%
worse than the national average −3 −3.3 (2021→2025) worsened→
107
Ljungby
Kronobergs län
85.3%
worse than the national average −3 −2.9 (2023→2025) worsened→
107
Lysekil
Västra Götalands län
85.3%
worse than the national average −3 −0.3 (2021→2025) worsened→
110
Askersund
Örebro län
85.2%
worse than the national average −3too few years→
110
Nykvarn
Stockholms län
85.2%
worse than the national average −3 +1.8 (2021→2025) improved→
112
Uddevalla
Västra Götalands län
85.1%
worse than the national average −3 −3.7 (2021→2025) worsened→
113
Katrineholm
Södermanlands län
84.9%
worse than the national average −3 −2.9 (2021→2025) worsened→
113
Landskrona
Skåne län
84.9%
worse than the national average −3 +3.7 (2021→2025) improved→
115
Lekeberg
Örebro län
84.8%
worse than the national average −3 −4.8 (2021→2025) worsened→
115
Lund
Skåne län
84.8%
worse than the national average −3 +0.4 (2021→2025) improved→
117
Berg
Jämtlands län
84.7%
worse than the national average −3 −2.0 (2021→2025) worsened→
118
Helsingborg
Skåne län
84.4%
worse than the national average −3 −0.1 (2021→2025) worsened→
118
Mörbylånga
Kalmar län
84.4%
worse than the national average −3 −0.6 (2021→2025) worsened→
120
Skara
Västra Götalands län
84.3%
worse than the national average −4 +3.3 (2021→2025) improved→
121
Norsjö
Västerbottens län
84.2%
worse than the national average −4 −4.1 (2023→2025) worsened→
121
Salem
Stockholms län
84.2%
worse than the national average −4 −1.8 (2021→2025) worsened→
123
Östhammar
Uppsala län
83.9%
worse than the national average −4 +1.0 (2021→2025) improved→
124
Köping
Västmanlands län
83.8%
worse than the national average −4 −0.6 (2021→2025) worsened→
125
Åstorp
Skåne län
83.6%
worse than the national average −4 −4.3 (2021→2025) worsened→
126
Hallsberg
Örebro län
83.4%
worse than the national average −4 +2.9 (2021→2025) improved→
127
Bengtsfors
Västra Götalands län
83.2%
worse than the national average −5 −2.8 (2021→2025) worsened→
128
Kungsbacka
Hallands län
82.9%
worse than the national average −5 −2.5 (2021→2025) worsened→
129
Kiruna
Norrbottens län
82.7%
worse than the national average −5 −1.4 (2023→2025) worsened→
130
Flen
Södermanlands län
82.6%
worse than the national average −5 +1.6 (2021→2025) improved→
131
Boden
Norrbottens län
82.3%
worse than the national average −6 −8.9 (2021→2025) worsened→
132
Mariestad
Västra Götalands län
82.2%
worse than the national average −6 −4.6 (2021→2025) worsened→
132
Skurup
Skåne län
82.2%
worse than the national average −6 +2.1 (2021→2025) improved→
134
Essunga
Västra Götalands län
82.0%
worse than the national average −6 −1.9 (2021→2025) worsened→
135
Hässleholm
Skåne län
81.8%
worse than the national average −6 −7.4 (2021→2025) worsened→
135
Ragunda
Jämtlands län
81.8%
worse than the national average −6 +4.5 (2021→2025) improved→
137
Gällivare
Norrbottens län
81.7%
worse than the national average −6 −3.1 (2021→2025) worsened→
137
Kinda
Östergötlands län
81.7%
worse than the national average −6 +0.2 (2021→2025) improved→
139
Svenljunga
Västra Götalands län
81.6%
worse than the national average −6 +0.3 (2023→2025) improved→
140
Gislaved
Jönköpings län
81.5%
worse than the national average −6 −3.5 (2021→2025) worsened→
140
Heby
Uppsala län
81.5%
worse than the national average −6 −1.4 (2022→2025) worsened→
142
Ale
Västra Götalands län
80.8%
worse than the national average −7 −5.7 (2023→2025) worsened→
143
Tanum
Västra Götalands län
80.3%
worse than the national average −8 −5.8 (2021→2025) worsened→
143
Vara
Västra Götalands län
80.3%
worse than the national average −8 +10.9 (2021→2025) improved→
145
Ludvika
Dalarnas län
80.1%
worse than the national average −8 −4.9 (2021→2025) worsened→
146
Lindesberg
Örebro län
79.9%
worse than the national average −8 +1.8 (2023→2025) improved→
147
Lomma
Skåne län
79.7%
worse than the national average −8 −3.4 (2021→2025) worsened→
148
Robertsfors
Västerbottens län
79.6%
worse than the national average −8 +1.4 (2021→2025) improved→
149
Södertälje
Stockholms län
79.5%
worse than the national average −8 −1.4 (2021→2025) worsened→
150
Haparanda
Norrbottens län
79.4%
worse than the national average −8 +1.2 (2021→2025) improved→
150
Svalöv
Skåne län
79.4%
worse than the national average −8too few years→
152
Söderhamn
Gävleborgs län
79.1%
worse than the national average −9 −6.2 (2021→2025) worsened→
153
Emmaboda
Kalmar län
79.0%
worse than the national average −9 +6.4 (2022→2025) improved→
154
Lessebo
Kronobergs län
77.8%
worse than the national average −10 −6.0 (2021→2025) worsened→
155
Vellinge
Skåne län
77.7%
worse than the national average −10 −0.7 (2021→2025) worsened→
156
Lilla Edet
Västra Götalands län
73.5%
worse than the national average −14 −0.6 (2021→2025) worsened→
157
Malmö
Skåne län
73.2%
worse than the national average −15 −4.0 (2022→2025) worsened→
158
Trelleborg
Skåne län
63.7%
worse than the national average −24 +6.8 (2021→2025) improved→
159
Staffanstorp
Skåne län
46.5%
worse than the national average −41 +8.4 (2021→2025) improved→

Does not take part in the survey (131)

131 municipalities have no responses for 2025 and cannot be ranked.

Alingsås Alvesta Älvsbyn Åmål Ånge Arboga Årjäng Arjeplog Arvika Åsele Åtvidaberg Bjurholm Bjuv Bollebygd Bollnäs Borlänge Bräcke Burlöv Dals-Ed Degerfors Dorotea Eda Eksjö Eslöv Fagersta Falkenberg Färgelanda Filipstad Finspång Gotland Grästorp Grums Habo Hagfors Hällefors Halmstad Hammarö Haninge Härjedalen Härryda Hedemora Hjo Hofors Höganäs Högsby Höör Hörby Hultsfred Hylte Kalix Karlsborg Karlshamn Karlskoga Kil Kramfors Kristianstad Krokom Kumla Kungälv Kungsör Laholm Laxå Leksand Lerum Ljusdal Ljusnarsberg Malå Malung-Sälen Mellerud Mönsterås Mora Munkedal Munkfors Nacka Nässjö Nora Norberg Nordanstig Norrköping Norrtälje Öckerö Ödeshög Olofström Örnsköldsvik Orust Osby Östra Göinge Ovanåker Överkalix Övertorneå Pajala Partille Sandviken Sävsjö Sigtuna Simrishamn Skellefteå Skinnskatteberg Smedjebacken Sollefteå Sollentuna Solna Sorsele Sotenäs Stenungsund Stockholm Strömstad Strömsund Surahammar Tibro Tidaholm Tierp Tingsryd Tomelilla Töreboda Torsås Torsby Tranemo Upplands Väsby Uppvidinge Vadstena Vaggeryd Valdemarsvik Vänersborg Vansbro Vårgårda Västerås Vilhelmina Vimmerby Vindeln Vingåker

All 290 municipalities · 159 took part in the 2025 survey

Best result by year

YearMunicipalityShareOf
2025Tyresö97.1%159
2024Tyresö98.6%128
2023Lidingö97.6%162
2022Sollefteå96.1%137
2021Åmål98.5%161
Cite

Source: Statistics Sweden (SCB), Citizen Survey 2025. Analysis: sverige.fyi. https://sverige.fyi/en/rankings/residents-view/most-residents-satisfied-with-outdoor-areas

  • Statistics Sweden (SCB): open data, free to reuse (CC0).
View on the map

See how the results are distributed geographically on the map