Sverige FYI› Rankings› Residents' view› Living Environment
Municipalities where most residents value grocery-store proximity
As many as 93% of residents nationally name closeness to grocery stores as important in their living environment. The question measures how highly residents value that closeness, not how far it actually is to the nearest store. 159 municipalities answered in 2025.
Source: Statistics Sweden, ME0003 Last updated: 2025
93%
national average 2025
159 / 290
municipalities took part
98.8%
highest · Sundbyberg
Differences are shown in percentage points (pp).
Filters the list by municipality name.
290 municipalities
| # | Municipality | Share considering it important | vs national average | Trend | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sundbyberg Stockholms län | 98.8% | better than the national average +6 | +3.0 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 2 | Nordmaling Västerbottens län | 97.4% | better than the national average +4 | +2.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 3 | Malmö Skåne län | 97.0% | better than the national average +4 | +2.1 (2022→2025) improved | → |
| 4 | Varberg Hallands län | 96.8% | better than the national average +4 | +3.0 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 5 | Göteborg Västra Götalands län | 96.3% | better than the national average +3 | +1.5 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 6 | Trosa Södermanlands län | 96.1% | better than the national average +3 | +4.7 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 7 | Båstad Skåne län | 96.0% | better than the national average +3 | +1.6 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 7 | Helsingborg Skåne län | 96.0% | better than the national average +3 | +2.5 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 7 | Lomma Skåne län | 96.0% | better than the national average +3 | +1.0 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 7 | Ragunda Jämtlands län | 96.0% | better than the national average +3 | +1.2 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 7 | Staffanstorp Skåne län | 96.0% | better than the national average +3 | +5.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 12 | Ockelbo Gävleborgs län | 95.9% | better than the national average +3 | +2.1 (2023→2025) improved | → |
| 13 | Kalmar Kalmar län | 95.8% | better than the national average +3 | +1.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 14 | Karlskrona Blekinge län | 95.7% | better than the national average +3 | +3.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 14 | Lidingö Stockholms län | 95.7% | better than the national average +3 | +3.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 16 | Emmaboda Kalmar län | 95.6% | better than the national average +2 | +0.1 (2022→2025) improved | → |
| 16 | Gullspång Västra Götalands län | 95.6% | better than the national average +2 | −1.0 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 18 | Danderyd Stockholms län | 95.3% | better than the national average +2 | +1.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 18 | Mölndal Västra Götalands län | 95.3% | better than the national average +2 | +1.2 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 20 | Lund Skåne län | 95.2% | better than the national average +2 | +2.3 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 20 | Södertälje Stockholms län | 95.2% | better than the national average +2 | +4.7 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 20 | Älvdalen Dalarnas län | 95.2% | better than the national average +2 | −0.8 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 23 | Bromölla Skåne län | 95.1% | better than the national average +2 | +5.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 23 | Täby Stockholms län | 95.1% | better than the national average +2 | +0.7 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 25 | Gävle Gävleborgs län | 95.0% | better than the national average +2 | +4.0 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 25 | Landskrona Skåne län | 95.0% | better than the national average +2 | +3.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 25 | Markaryd Kronobergs län | 95.0% | better than the national average +2 | +0.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 28 | Huddinge Stockholms län | 94.9% | better than the national average +2 | +2.0 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 28 | Motala Östergötlands län | 94.9% | better than the national average +2 | +5.6 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 28 | Timrå Västernorrlands län | 94.9% | better than the national average +2 | −0.8 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 31 | Heby Uppsala län | 94.8% | better than the national average +2 | +3.6 (2022→2025) improved | → |
| 31 | Karlstad Värmlands län | 94.8% | better than the national average +2 | +1.2 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 33 | Älvkarleby Uppsala län | 94.7% | better than the national average +2 | too few years | → |
| 34 | Järfälla Stockholms län | 94.6% | better than the national average +1 | +2.0 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 34 | Sundsvall Västernorrlands län | 94.6% | better than the national average +1 | +2.3 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 34 | Upplands-Bro Stockholms län | 94.6% | better than the national average +1 | +4.9 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 37 | Botkyrka Stockholms län | 94.4% | better than the national average +1 | +2.6 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 38 | Forshaga Värmlands län | 94.3% | better than the national average +1 | +1.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 38 | Lysekil Västra Götalands län | 94.3% | better than the national average +1 | +1.0 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 40 | Tjörn Västra Götalands län | 94.2% | better than the national average +1 | +3.9 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 41 | Berg Jämtlands län | 94.1% | better than the national average +1 | −0.4 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 41 | Borgholm Kalmar län | 94.1% | better than the national average +1 | +2.5 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 41 | Lessebo Kronobergs län | 94.1% | better than the national average +1 | −1.1 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 41 | Trollhättan Västra Götalands län | 94.1% | better than the national average +1 | +1.0 (2023→2025) improved | → |
| 45 | Gagnef Dalarnas län | 94.0% | better than the national average +1 | +1.6 (2022→2025) improved | → |
| 45 | Kinda Östergötlands län | 94.0% | better than the national average +1 | +1.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 45 | Linköping Östergötlands län | 94.0% | better than the national average +1 | +1.7 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 45 | Luleå Norrbottens län | 94.0% | better than the national average +1 | +3.6 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 45 | Mörbylånga Kalmar län | 94.0% | better than the national average +1 | +1.6 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 45 | Uppsala Uppsala län | 94.0% | better than the national average +1 | +1.6 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 51 | Mullsjö Jönköpings län | 93.8% | better than the national average +1 | +3.1 (2022→2025) improved | → |
| 51 | Örebro Örebro län | 93.8% | better than the national average +1 | −1.2 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 53 | Kiruna Norrbottens län | 93.7% | at national average | −0.2 (2023→2025) worsened | → |
| 53 | Skurup Skåne län | 93.7% | at national average | +1.6 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 55 | Gnosjö Jönköpings län | 93.6% | at national average | +3.6 (2023→2025) improved | → |
| 55 | Hallsberg Örebro län | 93.6% | at national average | +6.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 55 | Jönköping Jönköpings län | 93.6% | at national average | +2.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 55 | Vellinge Skåne län | 93.6% | at national average | +2.9 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 55 | Västervik Kalmar län | 93.6% | at national average | +1.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 55 | Åstorp Skåne län | 93.6% | at national average | −0.9 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 61 | Vara Västra Götalands län | 93.4% | at national average | +2.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 62 | Norsjö Västerbottens län | 93.3% | at national average | +0.6 (2023→2025) improved | → |
| 62 | Svalöv Skåne län | 93.3% | at national average | too few years | → |
| 62 | Örkelljunga Skåne län | 93.3% | at national average | +2.5 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 65 | Söderhamn Gävleborgs län | 93.2% | at national average | −2.1 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 65 | Östhammar Uppsala län | 93.2% | at national average | +1.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 67 | Säffle Värmlands län | 93.1% | at national average | +1.2 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 68 | Rättvik Dalarnas län | 93.0% | at national average | +0.3 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 68 | Tyresö Stockholms län | 93.0% | at national average | +1.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 70 | Säter Dalarnas län | 92.9% | at national average | +1.0 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 71 | Värnamo Jönköpings län | 92.8% | at national average | +3.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 72 | Hudiksvall Gävleborgs län | 92.7% | at national average | −1.6 (2022→2025) worsened | → |
| 72 | Svedala Skåne län | 92.7% | at national average | +1.7 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 74 | Umeå Västerbottens län | 92.6% | worse than the national average −1 | −1.3 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 74 | Ystad Skåne län | 92.6% | worse than the national average −1 | +1.7 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 76 | Vaxholm Stockholms län | 92.3% | worse than the national average −1 | +1.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 77 | Växjö Kronobergs län | 92.2% | worse than the national average −1 | +1.5 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 78 | Katrineholm Södermanlands län | 92.1% | worse than the national average −1 | +5.2 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 78 | Knivsta Uppsala län | 92.1% | worse than the national average −1 | +0.9 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 78 | Ludvika Dalarnas län | 92.1% | worse than the national average −1 | +1.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 81 | Avesta Dalarnas län | 92.0% | worse than the national average −1 | +1.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 81 | Lycksele Västerbottens län | 92.0% | worse than the national average −1 | +3.0 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 83 | Boxholm Östergötlands län | 91.9% | worse than the national average −1 | −0.6 (2023→2025) worsened | → |
| 83 | Flen Södermanlands län | 91.9% | worse than the national average −1 | +0.9 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 83 | Lindesberg Örebro län | 91.9% | worse than the national average −1 | +1.1 (2023→2025) improved | → |
| 86 | Ekerö Stockholms län | 91.8% | worse than the national average −1 | +4.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 86 | Hallstahammar Västmanlands län | 91.8% | worse than the national average −1 | −0.5 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 86 | Kungsbacka Hallands län | 91.8% | worse than the national average −1 | +4.6 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 86 | Perstorp Skåne län | 91.8% | worse than the national average −1 | ±0.0 (2021→2025) unchanged | → |
| 90 | Arvidsjaur Norrbottens län | 91.7% | worse than the national average −1 | +1.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 90 | Jokkmokk Norrbottens län | 91.7% | worse than the national average −1 | −2.4 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 90 | Österåker Stockholms län | 91.7% | worse than the national average −1 | +1.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 93 | Bengtsfors Västra Götalands län | 91.6% | worse than the national average −2 | +2.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 93 | Borås Västra Götalands län | 91.6% | worse than the national average −2 | −1.8 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 93 | Härnösand Västernorrlands län | 91.6% | worse than the national average −2 | +4.5 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 93 | Mark Västra Götalands län | 91.6% | worse than the national average −2 | too few years | → |
| 93 | Skövde Västra Götalands län | 91.6% | worse than the national average −2 | −0.5 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 98 | Kävlinge Skåne län | 91.5% | worse than the national average −2 | +2.5 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 98 | Mariestad Västra Götalands län | 91.5% | worse than the national average −2 | +2.7 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 98 | Salem Stockholms län | 91.5% | worse than the national average −2 | −1.5 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 98 | Åre Jämtlands län | 91.5% | worse than the national average −2 | −1.2 (2022→2025) worsened | → |
| 102 | Boden Norrbottens län | 91.4% | worse than the national average −2 | −2.1 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 102 | Gällivare Norrbottens län | 91.4% | worse than the national average −2 | +1.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 102 | Tanum Västra Götalands län | 91.4% | worse than the national average −2 | +1.3 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 105 | Falköping Västra Götalands län | 91.3% | worse than the national average −2 | +0.6 (2022→2025) improved | → |
| 105 | Nybro Kalmar län | 91.3% | worse than the national average −2 | +0.5 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 105 | Nyköping Södermanlands län | 91.3% | worse than the national average −2 | −1.2 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 105 | Piteå Norrbottens län | 91.3% | worse than the national average −2 | −1.2 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 105 | Tranås Jönköpings län | 91.3% | worse than the national average −2 | +3.1 (2022→2025) improved | → |
| 110 | Nynäshamn Stockholms län | 91.2% | worse than the national average −2 | +2.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 110 | Vallentuna Stockholms län | 91.2% | worse than the national average −2 | +1.7 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 110 | Vännäs Västerbottens län | 91.2% | worse than the national average −2 | −0.2 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 113 | Ljungby Kronobergs län | 91.1% | worse than the national average −2 | +2.6 (2023→2025) improved | → |
| 113 | Oxelösund Södermanlands län | 91.1% | worse than the national average −2 | too few years | → |
| 115 | Falun Dalarnas län | 91.0% | worse than the national average −2 | −1.1 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 115 | Gislaved Jönköpings län | 91.0% | worse than the national average −2 | −1.1 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 117 | Oskarshamn Kalmar län | 90.9% | worse than the national average −2 | −1.9 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 118 | Essunga Västra Götalands län | 90.8% | worse than the national average −2 | +2.2 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 118 | Lekeberg Örebro län | 90.8% | worse than the national average −2 | +2.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 120 | Trelleborg Skåne län | 90.7% | worse than the national average −2 | +1.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 120 | Ängelholm Skåne län | 90.7% | worse than the national average −2 | +3.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 122 | Herrljunga Västra Götalands län | 90.6% | worse than the national average −3 | +2.8 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 123 | Robertsfors Västerbottens län | 90.5% | worse than the national average −3 | +1.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 124 | Ale Västra Götalands län | 90.4% | worse than the national average −3 | −2.4 (2023→2025) worsened | → |
| 124 | Eskilstuna Södermanlands län | 90.4% | worse than the national average −3 | −0.3 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 124 | Sölvesborg Blekinge län | 90.4% | worse than the national average −3 | −2.3 (2022→2025) worsened | → |
| 127 | Götene Västra Götalands län | 90.2% | worse than the national average −3 | −1.5 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 127 | Svenljunga Västra Götalands län | 90.2% | worse than the national average −3 | −0.8 (2023→2025) worsened | → |
| 129 | Klippan Skåne län | 90.1% | worse than the national average −3 | −3.1 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 129 | Östersund Jämtlands län | 90.1% | worse than the national average −3 | −1.8 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 131 | Älmhult Kronobergs län | 89.9% | worse than the national average −3 | +5.6 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 132 | Nykvarn Stockholms län | 89.8% | worse than the national average −3 | +3.0 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 132 | Storuman Västerbottens län | 89.8% | worse than the national average −3 | +1.0 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 132 | Sunne Värmlands län | 89.8% | worse than the national average −3 | −2.3 (2022→2025) worsened | → |
| 135 | Hässleholm Skåne län | 89.7% | worse than the national average −3 | −1.6 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 136 | Askersund Örebro län | 89.6% | worse than the national average −4 | too few years | → |
| 136 | Vetlanda Jönköpings län | 89.6% | worse than the national average −4 | +2.3 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 138 | Mjölby Östergötlands län | 89.5% | worse than the national average −4 | −2.4 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 138 | Uddevalla Västra Götalands län | 89.5% | worse than the national average −4 | +1.2 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 140 | Orsa Dalarnas län | 89.4% | worse than the national average −4 | +0.3 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 140 | Ronneby Blekinge län | 89.4% | worse than the national average −4 | −0.7 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 142 | Haparanda Norrbottens län | 89.3% | worse than the national average −4 | −2.7 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 143 | Lidköping Västra Götalands län | 89.2% | worse than the national average −4 | +1.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 143 | Lilla Edet Västra Götalands län | 89.2% | worse than the national average −4 | −1.7 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 143 | Skara Västra Götalands län | 89.2% | worse than the national average −4 | +1.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 143 | Ulricehamn Västra Götalands län | 89.2% | worse than the national average −4 | +0.5 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 147 | Gnesta Södermanlands län | 89.1% | worse than the national average −4 | +1.9 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 147 | Kristinehamn Värmlands län | 89.1% | worse than the national average −4 | +2.4 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 149 | Enköping Uppsala län | 88.3% | worse than the national average −5 | +1.6 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 150 | Håbo Uppsala län | 88.2% | worse than the national average −5 | ±0.0 (2021→2025) unchanged | → |
| 150 | Sjöbo Skåne län | 88.2% | worse than the national average −5 | −0.4 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 150 | Strängnäs Södermanlands län | 88.2% | worse than the national average −5 | −0.5 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 153 | Köping Västmanlands län | 88.1% | worse than the national average −5 | −2.5 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 154 | Sala Västmanlands län | 87.8% | worse than the national average −5 | −1.5 (2022→2025) worsened | → |
| 155 | Aneby Jönköpings län | 87.2% | worse than the national average −6 | +2.1 (2021→2025) improved | → |
| 156 | Värmdö Stockholms län | 86.9% | worse than the national average −6 | −0.5 (2021→2025) worsened | → |
| 157 | Söderköping Östergötlands län | 86.8% | worse than the national average −6 | too few years | → |
| 158 | Ydre Östergötlands län | 85.0% | worse than the national average −8 | too few years | → |
| 159 | Storfors Värmlands län | 84.7% | worse than the national average −8 | too few years | → |
Does not take part in the survey (131)
131 municipalities have no responses for 2025 and cannot be ranked.
Alingsås Alvesta Älvsbyn Åmål Ånge Arboga Årjäng Arjeplog Arvika Åsele Åtvidaberg Bjurholm Bjuv Bollebygd Bollnäs Borlänge Bräcke Burlöv Dals-Ed Degerfors Dorotea Eda Eksjö Eslöv Fagersta Falkenberg Färgelanda Filipstad Finspång Gotland Grästorp Grums Habo Hagfors Hällefors Halmstad Hammarö Haninge Härjedalen Härryda Hedemora Hjo Hofors Höganäs Högsby Höör Hörby Hultsfred Hylte Kalix Karlsborg Karlshamn Karlskoga Kil Kramfors Kristianstad Krokom Kumla Kungälv Kungsör Laholm Laxå Leksand Lerum Ljusdal Ljusnarsberg Malå Malung-Sälen Mellerud Mönsterås Mora Munkedal Munkfors Nacka Nässjö Nora Norberg Nordanstig Norrköping Norrtälje Öckerö Ödeshög Olofström Örnsköldsvik Orust Osby Östra Göinge Ovanåker Överkalix Övertorneå Pajala Partille Sandviken Sävsjö Sigtuna Simrishamn Skellefteå Skinnskatteberg Smedjebacken Sollefteå Sollentuna Solna Sorsele Sotenäs Stenungsund Stockholm Strömstad Strömsund Surahammar Tibro Tidaholm Tierp Tingsryd Tomelilla Töreboda Torsås Torsby Tranemo Upplands Väsby Uppvidinge Vadstena Vaggeryd Valdemarsvik Vänersborg Vansbro Vårgårda Västerås Vilhelmina Vimmerby Vindeln Vingåker
All 290 municipalities · 159 took part in the 2025 survey
Best result by year
| Year | Municipality | Share | Of |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Sundbyberg | 98.8% | 159 |
| 2024 | Sundbyberg | 97.5% | 128 |
| 2023 | Malmö | 97.1% | 162 |
| 2022 | Täby | 97.3% | 137 |
| 2021 | Gullspång | 96.6% | 161 |
Cite
Source: Statistics Sweden (SCB), Citizen Survey 2025. Analysis: sverige.fyi. https://sverige.fyi/en/rankings/residents-view/most-residents-value-grocery-store-proximity
- Statistics Sweden (SCB): open data, free to reuse (CC0).
View on the map
See how the results are distributed geographically on the map